The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:16, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Overall: @HickoryOughtShirt?4 Good article! Hooks are interesting and the article is new and long enough. Just waiting on a QPQ and then i'll approve it. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:47, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The QPQ has to be a full review covering all the DYK criteria, from length and timeliness to policy issues such as neutrality and copyvio to the hook. HickoryOughtShirt?4, you don't need to wait for the nominator to respond to your review, but you do need to fully finish the QPQ review before Onegreatjoke can approve this nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:36, 8 October 2022 (UTC)