Template:Did you know nominations/Accounting, Organisations and Society
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Ohc ¡digame! 07:26, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Accounting, Organisations and Society
[edit]- ... that Accounting, Organisations and Society is a top academic accounting journal that focuses on the relationship between accounting and both human behaviour and organisations?
Created by Well-rested (talk). Self nominated at 06:46, 13 January 2014 (UTC).
the citation need tag needs to be cleaned up since the hook relies on that fact --Guerillero | My Talk 04:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, I've cleaned up that particular line. There are still other references that support AOS being a top-ranked journal, so I guess the hook is still ok? -Well-restedTalk 04:27, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Alternatively, instead of "top" we could use something like "4th-ranked accounting journal by 2012 impact factor", although that seems a bit wordy. -Well-restedTalk 04:30, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- The shorter version seems better, however, the article has fallen to 1094 characters. You need at least 1500 for a DYK. --Guerillero | My Talk 19:42, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yikes. Looks like I was a bit overzealous in my shortening. I'll be adding more information to the article in a day or two. -Well-restedTalk 20:05, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, I've added more information and the article is back above 1,500 characters now (if I counted correctly). -Well-restedTalk 21:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, lists don't count in the character count. The page is still under 1500 characters. Yoninah (talk) 13:44, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- That seems like a rather arbitrary rule (especially for a really short list). But anyway I've converted the list to prose -- I think it reads a bit better as prose anyway. :) --Well-restedTalk 21:04, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
