Template:Did you know nominations/2011–12 Ivy League men's basketball season
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 13:13, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
2011–12 Ivy League men's basketball season
[edit]( )
... that 2011–12 Ivy League teams Harvard and Princeton both defeatead 2012 ACC men's basketball tournament Champion Florida State?
- Reviewed: One of two remaining QPQ credits against Template:Did you know nominations/Michael Roth (baseball), Jason Krizan, Cody Martin (baseball).
Created/expanded by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nom at 08:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- The Alt below is more inclusive, but less interesting, IMO.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:43, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- I may expand 2011–12 Princeton Tigers men's basketball team, which may make both hooks possible.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- I have expanded and made the original here the hook there. Now proposing ALT.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- I may expand 2011–12 Princeton Tigers men's basketball team, which may make both hooks possible.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- (ALT1)... that 2011–12 Ivy League men's basketball season is the first time that four teams played in the postseason?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:43, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- (ALT2)... that 2011–12 Ivy League men's basketball season is the first time that four teams (Harvard, Penn, Princeton and Yale) played in the postseason?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- If Princeton and/or Penn wins tonight, we should run this during their game on the 21st.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- The Alt below is more inclusive, but less interesting, IMO.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:43, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Apologies for not reviewing last night. Was working on stuff over on Wikinews.
Article is long enough and new enough. No pictures in the article. Manual check of PDF and of articles here and here shows no cause for concern. Article reads as neutral enough to me. Alt1 and Alt2 appear to be properly formatted. Article is supported by inline citations. --LauraHale (talk) 20:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
ALT1 and ALT2:' Cannot find "is the first time that four teams played in the postseason" stated in the article. I can see four teams are playing there, but no text that indicates this is the first. This needs to appear in the article with a source. (To be fair, NOTHING in the post season section is sourced inside the tables. I normally don't demand sources for tables but as the facts are coming this specific section, sourcing really needs to improve.)Text appears in lead. (Not in relevant section.) Source is a tweet. Would like better sourcing for this. --LauraHale (talk) 20:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)- I have added a better source.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:58, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- P.S. both Princeton and Penn lost last night so there is no rush to schedule this on the main page.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:58, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
All good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 23:47, 20 March 2012 (UTC)