Jump to content

Talk:2011–12 Ivy League men's basketball season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2011–12 Ivy League men's basketball season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 19, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 23, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that 2011–12 Ivy League men's basketball season was the first time that four teams (Harvard, Penn, Princeton and Yale) played in the postseason?

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2011–12 Ivy League men's basketball season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LauraHale (talk · contribs) 01:39, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Lead is not written in summary style. It has references that do not appear elsewhere in the article. The lead needs to summarise the article. Please move unique information into the body, remove citations from lead, and have lead summarise the article. The list incorporation needs work.
Green tickY--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:16, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. The tables in the post season have no citations and no preceding text explaining them. Some solution needs to be found to address this, either by citing the tables with a reference column or by having text prefacing the tables which have citations which cover it and where the text explains some of what went on.
Green tickY--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). The tables in the post season have no citations and no preceding text explaining them. Some solution needs to be found to address this, either by citing the tables with a reference column or by having text prefacing the tables which have citations which cover it and where the text explains some of what went on.
Green tickY--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
2c. it contains no original research. The tables in the post season have no citations and no preceding text explaining them. Some solution needs to be found to address this, either by citing the tables with a reference column or by having text prefacing the tables which have citations which cover it and where the text explains some of what went on.
Green tickY--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment. Problems fixed. :) --LauraHale (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I reviewed this article on the DYK level and checked about 2/3rds of these things at the time. Hence review brevity. --LauraHale (talk) 01:50, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2011–12 Ivy League men's basketball season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:04, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2011–12_Ivy_League_men%27s_basketball_season&oldid=1196605987"