Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/100 metres at the Olympics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 22:50, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

100 metres at the Olympics

[edit]

Created by Sillyfolkboy (talk). Self nominated at 14:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC).

Reviewed: Lucy Madox Brown
  • A good, comprehensive, well-written, fact-filled article, neutral and well-sourced. Hook is sourced. Spot checks of the 140 citations show no close paraphrasing concerns. The style is straightforward and factual throughout, with many sources, so copyvio issues seem highly unlikely. The tag saying the introduction may be too long for the overall article length is daft: it is a long article. Maybe someone can scrap the tag - I think as a reviewer I cannot. A quibble is that some paragraphs do not have any citations. Fix that and GTG. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  • "Long intro" tag removed. The lede is five paragraphs, so it will be shortened into four or less without deadline. That should be mattered the least. Let's get this done and over with. --George Ho (talk) 18:16, 14 February 2014 (UTC)