Talk:Zoo.gr

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zoo.gr article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rules in zoo.gr vs zoo coins

it is noticed that many times the rules of the site do not apply. the administrators ignore complains and dont even answer repeated mails. the site and its structure favors old users who are good customers in great disadvantage of newcomers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.69.27.59 (talk) 13:00, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whether editors are 'old' or not, they still have to comply with the rules. The external links guideline clearly shows that if the official site is there, subdomains or secondary official sites are not necessary. Moreover, wikis, whether official (per the previous) or not (obviously) should not be there and hence are removed. Moreover, if your link-addition is challenged, it is to you to show that the link is necessary first before attempting to re-insert it. You could do so already at a bot-revert, you certainly should when another editor removes your edit. And then .. you are edit warring to keep a link in. So you see that the rules of this sites DO apply - discussion is one of them.

So can you, when your block expires, please explain first? Thank you. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 15:12, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zoo.gr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090303150534/http://www.dorabak.gr:80/ to http://www.DoraBak.gr

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]