Talk:Zoar Valley

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western New York (assessed as Mid-importance).

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technical

A few months ago, I attempted to flesh out and re-write most of this article. In particular, I tried to address the problems highlighted by the {{Technical}} cleanup tag by re-wording when possible and wikilinking any uncommon terms that are needed to highlight the specifics of Zoar's forests. Not having access to offline sources limited my ability to change some passages. Would there be any objection to removing the 'technical' tag for the article as it currently stands? I'm interested if anything remains unclear, especially since the 'technical' aspect of this article is close to my line of work, so I may not be the best to judge if the descriptions are clear to an average reader. Pinging Buffaboy as it appears they placed the tag in 2014 (for comparison, here's the article as it stood at that time). Thanks! Antepenultimate (talk) 14:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't looked at that article in quite some time, but I can still remember the bits of technical information that were scattered throughout the article. It surely wasn't the most technical article, but there were a lot of details that the average reader would not understand. Not only does the article feel less technical now, it appears to have more information on Zoar Valley as a whole. With that I don't think anyone would object. Buffaboy ^talk 15:00, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response Buffaboy, I'll likely remove the template in a few days if no-one else objects. Adding a more thorough description of this wonderful place was my goal, I'm glad to hear you say the article seems more comprehensive. Take care - Antepenultimate (talk) 15:18, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]