Talk:Zephyr Teachout

This article was nominated for deletion on September 23 2013. The result of the discussion was delete.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Zephyr Teachout. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Zephyr Teachout at the Reference desk.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Vermont Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont.

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

While a page on this professor was previously deleted, it appears that she is now a candidate for Governor of New York. That, in combination with her professional accomplishments, may merit a reappraisal. Rahul Mereand-Sinha (talk) 21:14, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actress?

This was in the text, unsourced. I only did a cursory search, but couldn't find anything to corroborate it. If there is a citation then it should be restored.

===Acting===

Teachout is also an actress, and has acted at the Unadilla Theatre in East Calais, Vermont, for several summers over the last twenty years, beginning with roles in two Shakespeare plays, as Katherine in Love's Labour's Lost in 1994, and as Imogen in Cymbeline in 1995, both under the direction of Tom Blachly. Her most recent role was as Winnie in Samuel Beckett's Happy Days in 2012, under the direction of Bill Blachly.

Bangabandhu (talk) 00:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zephyr Teachout. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20132218203500/http://law.fordham.edu/faculty/zephyrteachout.htm to http://law.fordham.edu/faculty/zephyrteachout.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent addition

Regarding this edit, the information added was not neutral. Additionally, being only mentioned by one website in one article does not strike me as particularly outstanding, and the article itself contains no direct endorsements. Dustin (talk) 17:20, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign website not WP:RS

This recent edit is problematic. Mayday PAC is a Super PAC. It says so right on their Wikipedia page, not to mention their website. Teachout's campaign website is not a WP:RS for this article. Please see WP:SECONDARY, WP:SPS, and WP:SOAP. The "Controversies" section is not a WP:BLP violation (although it could use some work and should be renamed). Champaign Supernova (talk) 22:22, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "Mayday PAC is a Super PAC... it says so right on their Wikipedia page". Wikipedia is not a WP:RS, especially when a claim is left unsourced on Wikipedia. But even if it was, just a few sentences later, it says "Mayday PAC has since announced a new, local approach citing "Across the country, citizens are passing reforms to their local campaign finance laws. This takes courage that is currently lacking in Congress."

So, it might be fair to say that Mayday was a Super PAC, but it makes much more sense to identify Mayday as what it currently is.

The problem is that Mayday contradicts itself on what it is. On their official facebook page, here, they identify themselves as such" "MAYDAY.US is a cross-partisan, national, grassroots campaign to fight big money corruption by electing candidates to fundamentally reform our campaigns!". See: https://www.facebook.com/MAYDAYUS/about/ On their website, they write that they are a "crowdfunded Super PAC" but then write "Mayday (MAYDAY.US) is an independent political action committee (PAC)". A PAC and a Super PAC are not the same thing. Therefore, to maintain WP:NPOV, the best way to do this is just to identify the organization's name.

On reflection, I agree that a campaign website is not a WP:RS in this case, and will redo the relevant additions and citations to reflect this.

The "Controversies" section is a pretty clear WP:SOAP violation. That website, "Trichordist", is a personal blog, and provides no references for their claims. I cannot find any similar or related claims in any other publication, let alone from a source that would be considered reliable. See WP:RS for guidelines. Note especially the guideline from WP:BLP that says: "Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion."

In accordance with this policy, I'm adding sources where appropriate, and reverting any other unsourced or poorly sourced contentions in good faith. To prevent an edit war, WP:EW, I won't do any reverts after this, but I will ask that you make any further changes manually, and address each issue point by point before reverting them, or refer to the talk page first. BirdyTom (talk) 14:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding campaign website and campaign/candidate-authored white papers as sources. They are not reliable because they are promotional. This is an encyclopedia article, not a campaign website. Champaign Supernova (talk) 15:32, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Primary results vs. polling

I added a sentence comparing her 2014 primary results (33%) to what the polls suggested (26%), and this addition was reverted without giving any reason; a citation was not asked for. I think the point of her outperforming the polls is informative and should have been retained. Frank Lynch (talk) 20:28, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]