Talk:Zdenko Blažeković/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 14:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've got this one. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 14:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Comments by Peacemaker67 (send... over) 06:57, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

in the lead, the first sentence is too long, and communist should not have an initial capital.
the first para of "Command of the Ustaše University Centre and Ustaše Youth" needs to be broken up, it is far too long.

Better? 23 editor (talk) 21:09, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 23, sorry this has stalled, but I have been unable to express properly my issues with the article as it is. Timbouctou has raised a number of issues on the article talk page which I believe do need to be addressed. I am going to place this on hold for a week in the hope that those issues can be addressed in that period. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 10:54, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've tweaked said parts according to Tim's translation. 23 editor (talk) 19:24, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peacemaker has essentially disappeared, so I'm going to put this one back in the review queue. Wizardman 02:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]