Talk:Z Special Unit

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Z Special Unit article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 90 days

Australia: Military history Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Z Special Unit is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Military history: South Pacific / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Article External links

The following external links have been changed:

Special Operations Australia website^{[dead link]} – April 2014.
The Guns of Muschu
RSL lays Yass soldier to rest – Video is expired.
Australian Department of Veterans Affairs, 2003, 'Operation Jaywick, 60th Anniversary' – HTTP 404 Not Found.
Roll of Honour, Awards and Images
ABC, 2010, Z Special Unit reunion at Fraser Island – Video is expired.
1944 Services Reconnaissance Department Training Film^{[dead link]} – April 2014.

Adamdaley (talk) 03:58, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Z Special Unit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20160112084609/http://specialoperationsaustralia.com/soa/ to http://specialoperationsaustralia.com/soa/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:56, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the word credited to Jack Wong Sue

The wording and credit for tjis small part should be changed from Sue to Harrisson, World within, p.342.Harrison is given credit to writing this fact by the AWM in 1984. I propose a change to the source/credit but not the facts. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.176.57.122 (talk) 01:12, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your proposal seems okay to me. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 04:54, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested changes

This whole page is incorrect as Z Special unit raised in March 1942 was the adminsitrative holding unit for the AMF (Army) members of SRD. This page is correctly referring to Special operations Australia and also its cover name the Allied Intelligence bureau. I have tried numerous time to correct this page and Operation JAYWICK but my corrections have not been included. Check the official records in NAA and stop perpetuating myths. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 3591doug (talk • contribs)

G'day, doug, I assume you are referring to this change: [1]. Is that correct? If so, the reason it was reverted was three fold -- firstly, it inserted text in a manner that impacted text-source integrity; the added text contradicted information that was already in the article without appropriately contrasting the varied viewpoints, and finally it essentially sort to change the title of the article without being done in an appropriate manner (i.e. a move request over the top of the Special Operations Australia redirect). I agree that the way the topics of SRD, SOA, AIB and Z Special Unit are handled on Wikipedia (and elsewhere) is confusing as the articles seem in many instances to cover common ground; however, if you want to make these changes they will need considerable effort and can't be achieved with a quick change here or there, and require discussion. These are significant changes and will require concrete proposals (backed up with references to reliable sources) on your behalf so that consensus can be achieved. If you wish to achieve this, then I would encourage you to provide a list of changes you would like performed (ideally across all the related articles so that the approach can be consistent). Ideally, I would suggest you provide a list here of the words you want inserted or removed, and a list of the references that back these changes up. As you seem to understand the sources, you are best placed to do this research (which would ideally focus mainly on secondary sources, albeit with some primary sources if necessary). If consensus is achieved for the proposed changes, then potentially a move request may also eventually be needed if the article was to be moved over the Special Operations Australia redirect. I am happy to help you through this process if you want where I can (I am away from home at the moment, so my editing times are a bit strange and will remain so for the remainder of the year). Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 17:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]