Jump to content

Talk:Yves Simon (philosopher)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yves Simon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Role of Formal Logic in Thomism

[edit]

I have deleted the suggestion that his relationship with Gödel bespoke open-mindedness compared to other neo-scholastics and pointed the reader to the Cracow Circle, wherein the latest developments in mathematical logic were considered part and parcel of the purview of Thomism. It is worth noting that Gödel devised his axiomatic refinement/repair of Anselm's ontological argument just a few years later (1941), and tempting to speculate that his conversations with Simon may have played a part in motivating it, perhaps even contributing to its structure! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_ontological_proof

"The aim of the philosopher is to acquire certain knowledge of ultimate reality. His instrument is reason. In Philosophy, more perhaps than in any other science, it is of the utmost importance that one's principles should be solid and one's reasoning accurate --An error in either may lead to startlingly absurd conclusions. Scholastics and Neo-Scholastics rightly insist that a thorough grounding in logic, deductive and inductive, is an essential perquisite for the correct solution of Philosophies problems." (P.J. Ryan, 1934, "The Fundamental Tenets of Scholasticism: Old and New") [1] Lewis Goudy (talk) 08:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References