Talk:Yungbulakang Palace
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Yungbulakang Palace article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Why is it called "The Mosher and Song Holy Hall"? Mosher and Song don't sound tibetan114.45.160.175 (talk) 13:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
1623
[edit]"According to Tibetan traditions, Yumbu Lakhang was erected in 1623 for the first Tibetan king, Nyatri Tsenpo" there is a mistake here: Nyatri Tsenpo vs 1623...--176.206.160.189 (talk) 20:25, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
The year 1623 AD is IMHO wrong. Can somebody please correct the mistake, or if it is the year in some other calendar: please add this information. I added an sentence with a reference that is hopefully more correct. The 2. century AD date of some is IMHO wrong, too. AndreAdrian (talk) 19:22, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Architecture articles
- Unknown-importance Architecture articles
- Start-Class Historic houses articles
- Low-importance Historic houses articles
- Historic houses articles
- Start-Class Central Asia articles
- Low-importance Central Asia articles
- WikiProject Central Asia articles
- Start-Class Tibet articles
- Mid-importance Tibet articles
- WikiProject Tibet articles
- Start-Class China-related articles
- Mid-importance China-related articles
- Start-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class fortifications articles
- Fortifications task force articles