Talk:Yukon Field Force

Yukon Field Force has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 20, 2017. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Yukon Field Force article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Canadian / North America

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Canadian military history task force
	North American military history task force

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yukon Field Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070922212602/http://thercr.ca:80/history/1894-1900/yukon_field_force.htm to http://www.thercr.ca/history/1894-1900/yukon_field_force.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Yukon Field Force/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 03:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is in great shape. I just have a few comments/queries:

the article would benefit from a map showing where the Yukon is, as an Australian, my knowledge of Canadian geography is limited, and I'm sure that would be common among readers not from Canada. I also think a map showing the route taken would also be useful in that section of the article.

Map added. Hchc2009 (talk) 09:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't clear what the relationship of the Yukon was to the rest of Canada at this stage, especially when you later say that ppl are travelling from Canada to the Yukon. Was it part of Canada at that stage?

Clarified a bit. Hchc2009 (talk) 12:31, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"external world" seems a strange combination, perhaps "wider world"?

Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 12:31, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd link Ottawa in the lead and at first mention in the body

Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 12:31, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

suggest adding the distance between Winnipeg and the Yukon, for context

Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 12:31, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

in "establishing a barracks there the following year." it isn't clear what year this was

Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 12:31, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note a talks about a stampede, I think that has a different meaning than gold rush, and suggest sticking to similar terms

In this context, they're equivalent, but agree its worth using the same term - done. Hchc2009 (talk)

link Parliament of Canada

Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 12:31, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

suggest linking Permanent Force of the Canadian Militia in the body at first mention

I think it already is...? Hchc2009 (talk) 18:44, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

suggest replacing the second instance of "the detachment" with "it"

Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 18:44, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

link Lieutenant-Colonel

Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 18:44, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"250 kilometres" needs |adj=on added to the convert template so it renders as 250-kilometre

Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:22, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

suggest "on to Fort Selkirk" rather than onto

Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 18:44, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

suggest being consistent with Fort Selkirk and Selkirk, unless the latter is a different place

Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 18:44, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Allen could use an ISSN or similar, as could Morrison (1974)

Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 18:44, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yukon Field Force in Vancouver.jpg needs either publication info or a date of death of the photographer for the current licensing

Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 18:44, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Military drills at Fort Selkirk, Yukon Territory, ca 1898 (HEGG 64).jpeg needs categorisation

That's me done. Placing on hold for seven days for above comments to be addressed. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:31, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by appropriately licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:37, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]