Talk:Yugoslav coup d'état/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 10:08, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Prose:

• Phrase non-Orthodox population may seem quite vague, especially for readers with no background knowledge of Yugoslavia - who, I assume, have no clue who those were or if those were separate nations or non-Orthodox Serbs.
  • Have re-worded, have a look, hopefully it is now clearer for the uninitiated.
• Does the Agreement in ... the balance in Yugoslav politics that had been achieved by the Agreement. refer to the Cvetković-Maček Agreement or something else?
  • Yep, I've given the full name given the distance between the previous mention and this point in the text.

Actually, this is it. Everything seems fine - I added a presumably missing word, several diacritics and wikilinked a few terms, please review those and revert any mess-ups. Referencing, images, mos-compliance check out nicely. The article reads very well, there's just two possibly unclear terms in the prose to address.--Tomobe03 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks for the review! Peacemaker67 (send... over) 01:30, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
  • You're welcome.