Talk:Young's Literal Translation

Bible High‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Translation studies Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Translation Studies, a collaborative effort to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Translation Studies. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.Translation studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Translation studiesTemplate:WikiProject Translation studiesTranslation studies articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Untitled

I have taken this list of things the article could use from a posting by User:Quuxplusone Triddle July 1, 2005 05:27 (UTC). This article could say more about Young, his translation, his reasons for making the translation, the idiosyncrasies of phrasing in the translation, and so on.

Original Hebrew & Greek?

From which documents or books did Young make his New Testament translations? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Drewjmore (talk • contribs) 19:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Bad Link

The middle link to download a PDF of Young's is a 404 not there.

I don't feel competent to remove this: could somebody do this please?

-dlj. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidLJ (talk • contribs) 12:54, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source Material

I removed this meta-discourse from the article and am placing it here instead:

What was the source material for the Old Testament?

Please give evidential substantiation for the claim that the Westcott & Hort text was used in the Revised Edition of 1887.

Also what was the source material for the Revision of 1898? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.152.34.251 (talk) 20:19, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is this different from KJV?

Does YLT use British English (to use NonOxford spelling with -ise suffix), and use archaic capitalized pronouns? 124.106.138.104 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:57, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about stylistic issues, but it's definitely different from the KJV. AnonMoos (talk) 10:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Date error

Is that supposed to say October 14, 1898, and not 1888? Misty MH (talk) 02:39, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]