Jump to content

Talk:York Castle/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:25, 24 November 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Fix capitalizations of Pounds, Brown, Cooper. Is there a missing colon in the title of Timbs and Gunn?
Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 22:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  2. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Is it really appropriate to refer to Victorian prison reform before Victoria ascends the throne in 1837?
Not really! Changed. Hchc2009 (talk) 22:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. B. Focused:
  2. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  3. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  4. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  5. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Nice job, fix these few issues and I'll promote. Have you thought about submitting your castle articles for a MilHist A-class review?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:25, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've been meaning to - will give it a go! Cheers! Hchc2009 (talk) 22:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that you'd have any problems passing it, based on these two articles.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:29, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]