Talk:Yokosuka

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 07:43, November 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Districts and municipalities task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Cities Start‑class

	Cities portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Untitled

Added Rika Ishikawa to the list of persons from Yokosuka per information on her Wikipedia page. --Xiaou 08:16, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear weapons

The thing about nuclear weapons sounded a little politically motivated, so I made it more neutral sounding by adding a comment about how difficult it would be to keep such a thing secret from the Japanese government when they jointly run the base with the US government.Worldruler20 (talk) 18:49, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The thing about nuclear weapons was admittedly unsubstantiated, not specifically related to Yokosuka, but to US Bases in general, and seemed to be no more than wild speculation, so I deleted it.

Pronunciation

Is there any chance someone with some expertise in the matter could put an International_Phonetic_Alphabet spelling on the page?

Cave Survey

Who conducted this survey of caves? How would someone acquire it? The information in the article isn't clear on why this was done or about citing the information.

--Gloriamarie 19:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it was the US Army Corps of Engineers, but I don't have a citation for that. Unfortunately there is no museum on the base, so finding detailed historical information about the place is extremely difficult. As for acquiring maps of the caves, you'd probably have to go to either the base public works office, or base security, and both of those offices would most likely assume that you're just interested in spelunking, which is strictly forbidden, due to the dangerous instability of the caves (collapses are frequent, as made evident by the numerous tunnel entrances which have spilled out onto the road). So if you asked to see the maps they'd probably just look at you like you're retarded and say no.

--Worldruler20

CVN-73

Can we please update the horribly outdated section on the George Washington, it's been in port here for awhile now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.56.145.34 (talk) 11:20, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to update any Wikipedia article with factual, relevant, encyclopedic information. And you're always welcome at Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan. Fg2 (talk) 11:36, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Yokosuka, Kanagawa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051216192209/http://www.pref.kanagawa.jp:80/osirase/kyoikusomu/ to http://www.pref.kanagawa.jp/osirase/kyoikusomu/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Yokosuka, Kanagawa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yokosuka, Kanagawa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20070621114530/http://www.yokosuka-benri.jp/db/g_info/l100050650.html to http://www.yokosuka-benri.jp/db/g_info/l100050650.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 September 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved — Amakuru (talk) 12:43, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yokosuka, Kanagawa → Yokosuka – Most other topics listed on the disambiguation page are WP:PTMs so it is rare to refer to them as just "Yokosuka" without context. Hence, the city is likely the WP:PTOPIC for "Yokosuka". feminist (talk) 12:38, 26 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 19:12, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support Per WP:PRECISE (already redirects here anyway) and per WP:DABCONCEPT the other items refer to this place. Its not the same as Nagano as there isn't a prefecture with the same name. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:59, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Category:Cities in Kanagawa Prefecture. Stop disrupting articles to advance minimalist titling theory. The current is COMMONNAME, and has the advantages of recognisability and consistency over the proposed. These proposals to alter the titling of swathes of articles should be proposed centrally, not in border skirmishs, and this should be opposed also per WP:TITLECHANGES. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:31, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I though Japanese cities no longer use the prefecture unless needed, see MOS:JPPLACE. Some in Category:Cities in Kanagawa Prefecture don't have the prefecture anyway. If disambiguation was needed, which it clearly isn't then it should be to Yokosuka (city) per Nagano (city). Crouch, Swale (talk) 14:44, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Yokosuka is not a designated city and therefore per MOS:JPPLACE, the form [[{city-name}, {prefecture-name}]] applies. Also, not all of the links on the disambiguation page are WP:PTMs. --MChew (talk) 15:03, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@SmokeyJoe and MChew: MOS:JPPLACE states that the prefecture should be included in the title When disambiguation is required. As the city is the WP:PTOPIC, disambiguation is not required. feminist (talk) 08:07, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry but that is not how MOS:JPPLACE is written: "For cities, use the form [[{city-name}, {prefecture-name}]]; for example, Mishima, Shizuoka. ". The phrase "when disambiguation is required" is with respect to only designated cities. The next sentence in MOS:JPPLACE states: "Exception: For designated cities, use [[{city-name}]] without appending the prefecture unless disambiguation from another city or prefecture is necessary." --MChew (talk) 08:56, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

“Not required” is a very weak assertion. Many good things are not required. Why does MOS:JPPLACE say something that appears at odds with the consistency seen in the category? —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:08, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See my response at another discussion. If other articles do not follow the MOS guideline, they should be moved to comply with the guideline. We should not be perpetuating a wrong just because other articles are wrong as well. feminist (talk) 09:11, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes guidelines get written by a few not with consensus. I suspect this, but haven’t had time to check. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:27, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:PRECISE and MOS:JPPLACE, which clearly states that When disambiguation is required: ... For cities, use the form [[{city-name}, {prefecture-name}]]; for example, Mishima, Shizuoka. Disambiguation is not required here, and consistency with other prefecture articles is unevenly applied, see. e.g. Category:Cities in Miyagi Prefecture. The JPPLACE wording was reinstated by User:Dekimasu [1] in August 2018, by the way. No such user (talk) 13:31, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.