Jump to content

Talk:Yavuz Sultan Selim Medrese

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yavuz Sultan Selim Madras. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:07, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Content: unsourced and/or original research?

[edit]

Based on the References section, which states "This Text is a result of a semester work at Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi" and which seems to cite "lectures" and "semester" as sources, this article kind of looks like it's literally a student's paper which has been copied into Wikipedia. The fact that it includes an external link ([1]https://web.archive.org/web/20100608153055/http://www.timkado.com/selimmadras.htm) to what appears to have been a copy of that paper (maybe with some paraphrasing?) on the original author's personal website also kind of supports that probability. If so, it's very likely to contain WP:OR; at minimum, it's unsourced in its current form (please see Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources for how articles should be sourced). Vaguely referring to a university course someone took over a decade ago is not verifiability. There may also be notability issues but finding sources would clarify this either way. R Prazeres (talk) 20:01, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]