Talk:XBIZ Awards

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the XBIZ Awards article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 April 2013. The result of the discussion was keep.

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Pornography Mid‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Awards / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Film awards task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

About Suggested Deletion

I have spent whole day transforming the award results into a decently formatted Wikipedia article. I'm not ok with some one planing to delete it just because it doesn't appela to him. -Easyas12c (talk) 00:12, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but you shouldn't claim ownership on an article; that's not how wikipedia works. In my opinion this could be merged into the awards page itself, just like the other awards. I'm not convinced it merits a page of it's own, it just looks like lis cruft. Oh and to my eye the flags go against the policy on flag use. But a big thank you for not deleting the tag out of hand. -Blowdart | ^talk 17:49, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not claiming ownership over the article. I do claim ownership over the actions that resulted in the initial form of the article. I feel that I am an individual who produced it. Extensive study of western philosophy reveals that this might be a mere feeling, and it is not easily defendable, yet I, provided my existence, can't help getting that feeling. Also, I don't have a problem with other people editing the article. I just can't see deleting the article as an improvement of it. -Easyas12c (talk) 04:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I read through most of the flag usage policy and I don't think the article is violating that, if you want you can bring up specific problems in a follow-up so we can discuss those in greater detail. -Easyas12c (talk) 04:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd have said the flag usage violates Do not use flags in general article prose and Do not emphasize nationality without good reason. And there's nothing wrong with "but a list' -Blowdart | ^talk 09:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is not prose, but the good reason rule is harder to interpret. I wouldn't think the countries were that important in articles about the persons, but I feel it is important for showing the distribution of awards between different parts of the World. Also I think this hi-lights the awards that are exceptional in this sense. -Easyas12c (talk) 18:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found out later that the same information already existed in Wikipedia (List of XBIZ Awards recipients), but that article was nothing but a list. -Easyas12c (talk) 04:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trimming some of the fat and better sourcing

While I don't support basically blanking the vast majority of this article, I do think that some more of it could be trimmed and/or updated. I removed a lot of awards that I thought were pretty minor (there may be more to come if we don't get some decent sourcing for more stuff here), and I don't know that listing all the current nominees is necessary in this article at all. A simple external link to those lists should be fine. Once someone does win something significant, it can surely go into this article, provided that it has a valid source. Guy1890 (talk) 05:18, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To start out, I've added some external links to lists of all the past XBIZ Award winners, which can be used later to populate more needed inline citations in this article here. Since the PORNBIO standard has been recently changed to exclude all nominations, it still doesn't seem necessary to me to list simple award nominees in this article. Guy1890 (talk) 00:27, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on XBIZ Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081217001753/http://www.xbizawards.com:80/theshow.php to http://www.xbizawards.com/theshow.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in XBIZ Award

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of XBIZ Award's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "xbizwin2016":

From XBIZ Award for MILF Performer of the Year: Pardon, Rhett (January 16, 2016). "2016 XBIZ Award Winners Announced - XBIZ.com". XBIZ. Adnet Media. Retrieved January 27, 2016.
From Keira Nicole: Rhett Pardon (January 16, 2016). "2016 XBIZ Award Winners Announced". XBIZ. Adnet Media. Retrieved January 16, 2016.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on XBIZ Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:XBIZ Award winners has been nominated for deletion

Category:XBIZ Award winners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Right cite (talk) 17:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:AVN Award winners has been nominated for deletion

Category:AVN Award winners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Right cite (talk) 17:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]