Talk:Xırdalan

Azerbaijan Low‑importance

	Azerbaijan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Requested moves

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the pages at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 20:05, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

– The all Azerbaijani city names should be moved to English version as it is official versions. Moreover, there is more results in English version of it and some Azerbaijani letters is unknown to readers, which will cause problems in reading the article such as "Xırdalan". Xoncha (talk) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NovaSkola 09:47, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - as with all the other moves. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:35, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than single-handedly making an undiscussed bulk moves that affects the stable titling of an entire article corpus, note that recent English books do use Turkic diacritics for Azerbaijani the same as en.wp historically has done for all Turkic geo articles: [http://www.amazon.com/Lonely-Planet-Georgia-Armenia-Azerbaijan/dp/174179403X/ Lonely Planet Georgia, Armenia & Azerbaijan uses Turkic diacritics] [http://www.amazon.com/Azerbaijan-Excursions-Georgia-Mark-Elliott/dp/190586423X/ Azerbaijan Excursions Guide uses Turkic script] etc. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:44, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support. All three titles use non-English letters. Red Slash 00:07, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 1 April 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vaticidalprophet 10:46, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Xırdalan → Khirdalan – WP:COMMONNAME and WP:UE. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jabrayil#Requested_move_4_October_2020. Thepharoah17 (talk) 10:27, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Mark Elliott Azerbaijan: With Excursions to Georgia 2004 p155 "Should you wish to see the fairly minimal sights of Xırdalan ( drinks factories ) ...". And again irrelevant citing that RM, as (1) this isn't a ghost town left by Armenians (2) that RM went contrary to WP:RS with bloc voting that looks like what it looks like, (3) this is not lost Armenian territory, this is an actual Azerbaijani inhabited city inside Azerbaijan. Rather than picking off individual Azerbaijan towns one by one for random names, wouldn't it be better to have an RFC to establish a rule to state that en.wp respects all Latin alphabet languages except Azerbaijani, and we can establish a rule to explain why Azerbaijani is the one Latin-alphabet language not welcome on en.wp. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:11, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per In ictu oculi.--Ortizesp (talk) 02:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.