Talk:Wylam
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Wylam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140623140437/http://www.theblacketts.com/articles/187-how-to-order-your-copy-of--a-history-of-the-blacketts to http://www.theblacketts.com/articles/187-how-to-order-your-copy-of--a-history-of-the-blacketts
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
"Town" vs "village"
[edit]Could the two anonymous users who keep switching the article between "town" and "village" please stop. You are both way beyond the WP:3RR rule. I have reset the page to its original state, since the latest edits broke the name of one of the sources used in the article. Blind replacing of words is a bad idea. If you want to make further changes to the article, please discuss them here before editing the article, and let's reach a consensus before the article is altered. Railfan23 (talk) 21:10, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- The article for "village" gives a population of a "few hundred to a few thousand", so at 1,924 inhabitants Wylam would clearly qualify. I'm not keen on "small village" though. Just "village" would suffice. Tammbeck (talk) 23:03, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- There's no clean distinction between a small town and a large village. I don't have a dog in this race, but most contemporary reliable sources call Wylam a village e.g. [1], [2], [3] etc. The main point is the IP editors involved should knock off the edit war, bring their reliable sources here and we can reach a consensus. Railfan23 (talk) 23:27, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed. The parish council also refers to the community as a village. [4]. I'm aware that "original research" is irrelevant, but I'm from a neighbouring village and I've never heard anyone refer to Wylam as a town. If there are no objections I will delete the word "small". Tammbeck (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- There's a pretty clear distinction in UK local government. Do they have a charter as a town? If they don't, they're a village (or a suburb of a city). There are some large villages these days, where modern housing estates have been added and governance hasn't caught up. AFAICS, Wylam is still a village. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:16, 29 December 2018 (UTC)