Talk:Wye Valley Brewery
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wye Valley Brewery article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Wye Valley Brewery appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 February 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Wye Valley Brewery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071005113052/http://www.wyevalleybrewery.co.uk/stories/dorothy_goodbody_stories_found_after_40_years.pdf to http://www.wyevalleybrewery.co.uk/stories/dorothy_goodbody_stories_found_after_40_years.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:51, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Reverting corporate hijack
[edit]It is clear that back in September 2017, the brewery's PR company, or some other paid-for entity, hijacked this page and sadly nobody did anything about it (diffs). The version of the page that I came across this morning was a total corporate sham - despite some efforts to clean it up (diff). So I took the bold decision to revert the article back to its August 2017 state. It isn't perfect, it will need some work, but it's way better than the crap the corporate PR people left behind. Another option could be to take the as-was puff-piece from this morning to AfD. Thoughts? 10mmsocket (talk) 11:29, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Kavanaghs, @Vixenvulpix, @Marlenedoesitbetter, @Derek R Bullamore, @Rich Farmbrough, @Mitch Ames, @Arjayay and others who have contributed to this article - I hope you don't mind my bold revert and maybe you can take a look at the article and see how it can be improved? 10mmsocket (talk) 13:22, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
- Fine by me. I have improved/expanded the existing referencing. Thanks, - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 15:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)