Talk:Worthing/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about Worthing. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Property market

User 217.42.43.136 added a paragraph on the property market. As far as I can see this is not relevant to this article. In fact that paragraph appeared to be a promotion for a local estate agent. So I don't think it was NPOV. --Seaweed 13:08, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

External links

I also removed the old external links which were to a political party, an local estate agents and a business web directory. I don't think they add to the content to this article. We would need to add links to all political parties, estate agents and busineses generally to be NPOV. --Seaweed 13:12, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

OK, now I've added an external link to Worthing Borough Council, which is the local government organisation. That seems to more relevant, does anyone agree? :) --Seaweed 13:18, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

I agree, the estate agent links always seemed a bit odd to me. ChrisGlew 14:43, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

Glaxosmithkline

Worthing is home to Glaxo smithkline. One of it's many factories is based in East Worthing. The pharmaceutical plant has been a big source of employment for those in and around the area.

Other citizens

I removed: "Chris Baldwin, a high-profile campaigner for the legalisation of cannabis and member of the political party Legalise Cannabis Alliance;" because it was inserted in a way that directly implied he was a member of The Worthing Workshop, which he isn't. If you want to re-add this sentence so it flows with the rest of the article, or create a section for other notable citizens (specifically those not categorised as 'Artistic and Literary') and re-add him then go right ahead, just don't dump a name into the middle of an unrelated sentence. Newsmare 16:24, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Nice use of biased there then mate. You could have re-edited it in such a way that made that clear, but you just deleted it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.3.251.87 (talk) 13:08, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

Talk:Worthing, West Sussex - Worthing -> Worthing (disambiguation) & Worthing, West Sussex -> Worthing - Primary topic disambiguation. Worthing was moved to Worthing, West Sussex without discussion on February 8th. Worthing has a hundred odd links ([1]) for Worthing West Sussex. The only other Worthing with an article is a small town in South Dakota with a population under 600. The Worthing, South Dakota article has had oinly 7 edits in 5 years. Jooler 07:39, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Support for sure, as primary topic disambiguation. — sjorford (talk) 14:48, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Support this is going to be a hard one to lose, seeing as almost the entirety of 'Worthing' traffic is actually for Worthing in West Sussex. Don't get complacent though, if you read/edit Worthing, West Sussex then it doesn't take a moment to add support. ◄ИΞШSΜΛЯΞ ► 05:12, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Strong Oppose as this is completely counter to existing naming conventions for places. What you should do, and can do without needing an admin or WP:RM, is move Worthing to Worthing_(disambiguation), and then change the redirect at Worthing to point to Worthing, West Sussex. Then add an {{otheruses}} template. See Boston for an example. -- WikidSmaht (talk) 23:51, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
- Rubbish. This proposal is not counter to existing naming conventions. There is a naming convention which states that when a topic name's primarily in use is for one particular placename or one particular person e.g. Exeter, Durham, Winchester, Birmingham (and a host of other places) or Michael Jackson this it takes precedence. The suggestion you have made however IS the norm for places in the United States where the "placename, US State" is commonly used and that is why Boston, Mass is not at Boston and Atlanta, Georgia is not at Atlanta. The only exception to this ruling for US places AFAIK is New York City, where New York, New York was deemed inappropriate. Outside of the US this ruling does not apply. Jooler 00:23, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Cannabis culture

While I support the mention of cannabis cafés in this article, the amount of information presented in this section really needs trimming down or entering into a seperate article or articles, as it's dominating the page. ◄ИΞШSΜΛЯΞ ► 20:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

I agree with the comment above, there's more about the cannabis culture than the town itself. --Frenchy21320 20:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Gang violence

Cut from the main article:

"The 'tradition' in Worthing of gang violence, as with the Skeleton Army and others discussed above, continues to this day. Currently, the town's two main gangs are the East Worthing Mafia‹The template Talkfact is being considered for merging.› ^{[citation needed]} and the Worthing Crew‹The template Talkfact is being considered for merging.› ^{[citation needed]} - led‹The template Talkfact is being considered for merging.› ^{[citation needed]} by the recently released from prison 'one-boy crimewave' Andy Dillon. [2] Both hail primarily from the East Worthing area‹The template Talkfact is being considered for merging.› ^{[citation needed]}. Encounters between the two groups are (given the nature of criminal gangs) surprisingly rare; feuds with similar groups from Lancing, along with attacks on the public [3], are far more common‹The template Talkfact is being considered for merging.› ^{[citation needed]}. Members have been responsible for‹The template Talkfact is being considered for merging.› ^{[citation needed]}, among other things: numerous racially motivated assaults [4][5], attacks on policemen [6], and even attacks on persons present at meetings for the prevention of gang violence. [7]"

"The East Worthing Mafia has been known to boast of its answer to the Chelsea Smile - the Worthing Smile - which consists of the removal of the victim's eyeball, followed by defecation in the newly empty eye socket‹The template Talkfact is being considered for merging.› ^{[citation needed]}. It is, however, highly unlikely that this procedure has ever been performed. It should also be noted that the group appears to be a mafia in name only, though it could well be responsible for some or all of Worthing's crack cocaine sales‹The template Talkfact is being considered for merging.› ^{[citation needed]}. [8]"

I was going to enter all the requests for citations on the articles main page, but it made it look so poor I cut it out and put here until such time as it's sourced correctly. The linked articles, as they stand, do nothing to prove connection between any of the incidents and the alleged gangs named in the contribution. If you want to add truely notable crimes or criminals from the Worthing area, then feel free - but avoid the urge to document stuff you've seen, stuff you've heard, or create some no-mark scroats wet-dream version of a vanity page. Seriously, I'd welcome the inclusion of gang culture if it were actually notable, but as it stands it's just the same shit that's been happening since the year dot i.e a bunch of local fuck-ups hang out together, occassionaly get caught breaking the law, some go to jail, some o.d., some grow up and move on to bigger and better... and no-one much cares but those directly involved. ◄ИΞШSΜΛЯΞ ► 14:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

If you must make criticisms of things posted here, you'd do well to a) give valid ones and b) do this in an adult manner. Your personal opinion on who 'cares' about the matter in question is completely irrelevant, and your talk of 'wet dreams' and such speaks for itself. The idea that every single sentence requires citation is especially ridiculous given that the majority of this very article lacks verification. If you'd kindly take the time to look around Wikipedia you would soon find that gang activity is found to be noteworthy - please find somewhere else to enforce your opinions. LukeMcCabe 00:04, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Ok, let me make this easy for you. You're attributing crime to the above named gangs. You. Not the articles you're using as support. Without citation. That makes it unverified. It also makes it original research. We don't take that here. If you don't like these facts, then look elsewhere.

Show Wikipedia one article that actually names the gangs, one article that confirms your claim as to who leads them, one article that claims the named gangs are responsible for the crimes you've attributed to them, one mention of the Worthing Smile or the alleged gangs' dominance in Worthing's crack distribution. Show us how a source other than yourself has tied all of this together into the picture you're trying to paint here. Then we'll take what you've offered, as you've offered it.

You've obviously got an interest to have rounded up the newspaper articles, so go the extra mile and make it count, if you think it does and if you can. All the best. ◄ИΞШSΜΛЯΞ ► 01:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I just wanted to add that if I could think of a way of cutting out what is uncited from the section in question without totally decimating it, I would have. However, I'm unable to do so, just as I'm unable to find cites for the questionable stuff anywhere. All I would be left with after removing those parts would be something along the lines of: "Worthing, like many other towns, has ongoing issues with youth criminality. Here's a list of some external articles from local papers detailing some...". If LukeMcCabe can do a better job, then I hope they go ahead. The only other option is to keep going around in circles until mediation is required. I'd rather resolve this simple dispute without such measures though, so I'll leave this article alone for a while to give LukeMcCabe or other interested parties time make the necessary citation. ◄ИΞШSΜΛЯΞ ► 02:04, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Somehow the fact seems to have eluded you that news reports give names only - and this is very rare - in the event of there being undisputed evidence proving that the gang or member in question is actually responsible for whatever is being reported. As a resident of Worthing I am well aware of the prominent gangs here; if you also live here, as would seem likely, you have surely noticed their grafitti everywhere. With regard to your last statement it is fair to say that I have gone quite far enough (see aforementioned point about lack of citation in the rest of the Worthing article) and that you are in no position to be challenging me to do anything.Lukemccabe 02:13, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I have to say that what I do or don't know about gangs/graff/gear in Worthing is not something I'd publicly distribute, and even if I was that way inclined I'd not do so as you have, because I'm able to comprehend what will and won't stick to the walls here.

Anyway, I left the matter alone for long enough. You obviously can't accept that your contribution is, at the least, original research and won't stop reinstating it after removal by myself and another established editor, WorthyDan. So far you've not shown interest in resolving the dispute, but as a last good faith attempt at resolution would you consider the 'further dispute resolution' steps outlined in Wikipedia:Resolving disputes or do you want something more final?

It's your move, as mediation can't really be requested if you're not willing to participate. I'm removing the disputed content from the article, so you have a simple, clear decision to make. ◄ИΞШSΜΛЯΞ ► 01:33, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

I'll say this in as few words as possible seeing as anything more is unnecessary... I did cite sources. Lukemccabe 21:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

None of the citations prove any of your claims, except maybe that one of the two alleged racist attacks by a group of teenagers was racially motivated, and that verdict in itself rules out gang related motives. ◄ИΞШSΜΛЯΞ ► 03:24, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh and allow me to mention again (seeing as you have so conveniently ignored it the last two times it has been mentioned) the fact that the majority of the Worthing page lacks citation. In fact the 'Gang violence' section contains by far the most sources on this page. Either cite sources for everything else on the page or request that it also be removed.Lukemccabe 21:32, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Again, useless sources that are only there to back-up original research, and fail miserably to do even that. As for me 'ignoring' the other parts of the article that aren't sourced - they didn't jump out at me as some retarded fantasy, simple as that. Feel free to tag whatever catches your eye though and if it's an area I can help with I'll try and provide, as I've done for this article in the past. ◄ИΞШSΜΛЯΞ ► 03:24, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Just read through the discussion here - there is enough sources for some coverage of gang trouble, but there is not enough coverage to draw the conclusions made here. We do not have reliable sources for the gang names, the tying of these particular gangs to these particular crimes, the gang feuds with Lancing, and the prevalence of public attacks over inter-gang attacks. The Worthing Smile section is completely unsourced, and just appears gratuitous.

WP:NPOV also talks of undue weight; is there any evidence that this violence is significant in the scale of overall crime in the town? Or perhaps that this gang violence is significantly more prevalent than in similar towns? Reports form the British Crime Survey would be useful. As it is, the news articles do not show a particularly notable level of violence compared to my experience of several comparable towns; the crime is indeed extremely unpleasant, but you have not yet established what is noteworthy in the encyclopaedic sense.

As it is, it's better to make the section absolutely watertight with further sources here than putting it on the article and having it picked to shreds by editors keen on strong citation. Strong claims need strong evidence - you have been asked for a higher level of citation, because the information has been challenged. If you want to challenge the veracity of the unsourced parts of the article, that is your prerogative, and will probably improve the article in the end. Aquilina 21:46, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Wikify tag added

I have added the wikify tag to this article as although there is a fair amount of interesting content, but too much of it appears as bulleted list form, rather than encyclopaedic prose. Tafkam 20:38, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

The {{wikify}} tag is mainly for style and linking fixes. I have changed the tag to {{Cleanup}}. Rich257 09:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Could you be more specific? I'd like some guidance as I work on this page. Thanks WorthyDan 21:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I disagree that crime is reducing I would say it is shown less in public. With the night clubs staggerd times also the random visible fights are less as there are less confrontations. Also define what you mean by gangs . There is a difference between a gang and a firm...especially in Worthing. As a resident I can think of several crews that could be considerd the east worthing mafia and they dont all work together. Mafia is an outside name given to the organisations that takes money from those below them for protection , mainly from other criminals. I dont think an inclusion on the 'gang; side of things is advisable as the only solid evidence you could give would mean naming people and there role and only then if they have been charged with crimes that can be linked to other members to prove they are actually working with eachother. Then you got the guys who havnt been caught . So you wont be able to give ac accurate desription without possibly making an innocent person seem guilty . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grodfg (talk • contribs) 23:01, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

Location maps

On the lower map in the info box Worthing has migrated to Hampshire. I tried to fix it without success. Anybody able to help? --Charles (talk) 20:30, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Charles, the problem is not the lat/long used. It seems to be a problem with {{Infobox Settlement}}. Most other UK towns use {{Infobox UK place}}. I'm not sure why Worthing doesn't. Perhaps because its a Borough and a Town? If {{Infobox Settlement}} was replaced by {{Infobox UK place}}, I'm pretty sure the red dot would be displayed in the right position. Crispness (talk) 12:16, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Methvens

not sure if it's worth putting this in the article but recently our methvens was said to be the 11th best bookshop in the country according to the independant http://independent.net-genie.co.uk/House_garden/59882/the_50_best_bookshops.html --198.28.69.5 (talk) 18:06, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Birdman Rally

As the birdman rally is now being held in Worthing, we need to do something with the Birdman article.

There are two articles at the moment. This article links to Birdman Rally which I suggest is a generic article for Birdman competitions. There is also the article International Bognor Birdman which is specific to the competition now held in Worthing and as it is the original, notable enough to merit its own article.

I propose we keep the Bognor article, but rename it to either International Worthing Birdman reflecting its current status or another name that keeps it specific to the original birdman competition.

Discussion at Talk:International Bognor Birdman#Article rename ++ MortimerCat (talk) 10:30, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

The article is now located at International Birdman MortimerCat (talk) 12:01, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Merge proposal

Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.

Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Cote, West Sussex, Findon Valley, Offington & Salvington to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 12:01, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

History Split

I have suggested splitting out the History section from this over-long and unwieldy article. The Worthing article is incomplete and is already over 100kb. The article itself needs considerable work to bring it up to an acceptable standard, but the history section seems to be the best set-out and best-referenced part of it. Accordingly, it seems timely to separate that into an article in its own write, if only in the hope that a shorter Worthing article might encourage more to make edits to bring it up to standard. Tafkam (talk) 19:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Once largest population of pensioners

'The town once had the largest population of over-65s in Britain, although now has a more balanced demographic.' Can this be verified? Was this ever the case? Worthing has long been associated with the over 65's but did it ever house the country's largest pouplation of pensioners? Broderick Curleyhair (talk) 14:02, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Major overhaul...

Is being started now. Plz see User:Hassocks5489/GM for proposed structure. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 21:50, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Sunny Worthing website

Apologies if I'm doing this the wrong way. I'm having difficulty in understanding how to add a reference to the Sunny Worthing website in the media section after the Porkbolter reference. My second attempt has once again been removed. No doubt due to not doing something to validate it. At 76 years it's not easy to take in complicated instructions and I again apologise for that. The Sunny Worthing website is a non-profit website featuring mostly photographs taken by myself or my late son. Perhaps I can get someone to assist in placing a link on the Wikipedia page for which I would be grateful. Lionel177 (talk) 22:57, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

The problem is not the way you are doing it but rather with the notability of the website. It is a lovely site and obviously important to you and your family but Wikipedia does not link to this kind of self-published site for notability, verifiability and copyright reasons. You can upload photos to Wikimedia Commons if you are prepared to put them in the public domain.--Charles (talk) 08:35, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your explanation, which I understand fully now. Your suggestion about Wikimedia Commons will be considered.Lionel177 (talk) 22:23, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Further to past discussions about the Sunny Worthing website. I have passed control and ownership to someone else. My main reason for this contact is to ask if its possible to add the Worthing Sunshine Radio community internet radio station that has been broadcasting since 1st March 2012. It has its studio at Ivy Arch Studios, Ivy Arch Road, Worthing broadcasting a wide range of programmes. It's website is www.worthingsunshineradio.co.uk and I myself present "The Big Band Sounds". If not possible to add this to the main body of the page perhaps a link could be placed. Thank you. Lionel177 (talk) 13:03, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

annual Temperature

You have written down that Worthing Annual Temperatureas 9.6 celsius but that is wrong, here is a met offic map http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/averages/sengland/7100_1km/MeanTemp_Average_1971-2000_17.gif which shows that the worthing area annual temperature is much much higher. so that means you should remove the paragraph about worthing annual temperature. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.194.68.32 (talk) 19:59, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Pronunciation

/ˈwɜrðɪŋ/ or /ˈwɜːðɪŋ/? JLincoln (talk) 19:00, 29 July 2012 (UTC) Neither in fact there is a break down using | | allowing ɜr as one sound, there is also no pause (and the idea of no r is irrelvant as it is a vestige of one for non-rhotic speakers of English see Help:IPA for English for more information. Incidentally following Template:UK places I have put the more common pronunciation across the town which is v in the middle, much like the well established pronunciations of the english words halfing, and roofing.

Sign please. Josh, linguist (talk)

Yes, I see - it's a bug. A sort of.:/ Josh, linguist (talk) 09:24, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

I was under the impression that the 'WorVing' pronunciation was simply a result of people being unable to pronounce the 'th' properly; most people I hear pronounce it like the th in 'farthing'. Also, 'halfing' is not a word, it is 'halving'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.155.211 (talk) 15:50, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

False climate averages

The current Worthing climate box average are not legit there just from a weather site, th eclimate box averages should be removed for as there giving false info that is not official calculated averages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.205.13 (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on Worthing

Cyberbot II has detected links on Worthing which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.bmihealthcare.co.uk/goringhall
Triggered by \bbmihealthcare\.co\.uk\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:19, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Worthing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:32, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on Worthing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Worthing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:36, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Worthing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130212014543/http://www.bournemouth.ac.uk/caah/landscapeandtownscapearchaeology/neolithic_flint_mines_of_sussex.html to http://www.bournemouth.ac.uk/caah/landscapeandtownscapearchaeology/neolithic_flint_mines_of_sussex.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://politics.guardian.co.uk/person/0%2C%2C-518%2C00.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://politics.guardian.co.uk/person/0%2C%2C-3203%2C00.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090324215904/http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/census2001/ks_urban_south_east_part_5.pdf to http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/census2001/ks_urban_south_east_part_5.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090703062530/http://www.worthingmasjid.com/ to http://www.worthingmasjid.com/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/caring/listing/listed-buildings/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 25 external links on Worthing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:55, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Worthing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Worthing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Property market

External links

Glaxosmithkline

Other citizens

See Also\External Links

Requested move

Cannabis culture

Gang violence

Wikify tag added

Location maps

Methvens

Birdman Rally

Merge proposal

History Split

Once largest population of pensioners

Major overhaul...

Sunny Worthing website

annual Temperature

Pronunciation

False climate averages

Blacklisted Links Found on Worthing

External links modified

External links modified

External links modified

External links modified

External links modified

External links modified

External links modified (January 2018)