Talk:World Trade Center
On 15 August 2015 (UTC) the original article World Trade Center was moved to Talk:World Trade Center/old and replaced with a new disambiguation page. The original article was text-split into the three articles World Trade Center (1973–2001), World Trade Center (2001–present), and World Trade Center site. This talk page includes the discussions for the original article World Trade Center. For the history of the original article itself, see here. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the World Trade Center page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
World Trade Center was one of the Art and architecture good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Material from World Trade Center was split to World Trade Center (1973-2001) on 10 August 2015. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
Material from World Trade Center was split to World Trade Center (2001-present) on 10 August 2015. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
against splitting
[edit]i'm against splitting the whole article into two.
The reason is:
I think, that it's better to have the subject resumed in one article, and instead of a desambiguation page, turn that page into a resumed article with links to the sister articles
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pancho507
Location of original article history
[edit]Shouldn't the history be at World Trade Center/old rather than Talk:World Trade Center/old, since it holds history that originated in article space rather than from its talk page? This thoroughly confused me while I was trying to understand where everything moved to in the split. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 05:20, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:World Trade Center site which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:28, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:World Trade Center (2001–present) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:01, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- Former good article nominees
- WikiProject Disambiguation pages
- Disambig-Class New York City articles
- NA-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles
- Disambig-Class Architecture articles
- NA-importance Architecture articles
- Disambig-Class Skyscraper articles
- NA-importance Skyscraper articles
- WikiProject Skyscrapers articles and lists