Talk:World Futures Studies Federation

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Futures studies Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

This page can hold discussions on how WFSF members can contribute to wikipedia. Ligtvoet 11:08, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You mean you are a member? -- Svest 19:02, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Almost all of the people joining in the Futures Raid are members. Some of them are also members of the World Future Society, and the Association of Professional Futurists. Oh, and the European Futures Conference Lucerne. Hmm. Probably need to add all those pages in, too. wendyif 23:29, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is really serious, lol ;) -- Svest 02:11, 1 November 2005 (UTC) ^{Wiki me up}[reply]

You betcha! :-) wendyif 08:36, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

link to forum

hello, I removed the link to forum as there isn't an article currently for that usage of the term - and I believe that an article covering that usage would merely be a dictionary definition. If you disagree, please feel free to revert the edit/create a new article. Politepunk 17:00, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note wrt the Speedy deletion request

The article has changed quite a bit in its 5-year history but what remains the same throughout is that it is a copyvio of various subpages of http://www.wfsf.org. I checked it back to the year 2005, I did not find any version that does not appear verbatim on this copyrighted page.

It also seems this article has a history of COI violations. --Pgallert (talk) 13:20, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]