Talk:Workers' Party (Brazil)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Workers' Party (Brazil) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Socialism High‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organized Labour High‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brazil: Government and laws High‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Government and Laws of Brazil task force (assessed as High-importance).

Politics: Political parties High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as High-importance).

Untitled

Mensalao is a not just a popular word. It is used extensively by newspapers and televisions. It would be just a funny fact not to include this word in reference to the crisis of 2005.

Nothing against the word, but "2005 Crisis - Mensalão Scandal" is too, too long. José San Martin 00:35, August 14, 2005 (UTC)

Coverage of crisis

IMHO the attemp of covarage to the actual crisis in the Worker's Party best fits to WikiNews, especially regarding to the newspaper poll mention. When one puts such information in an encyclopedical article, which should concern much more about the history of the party, its ideology, structure and members, it seems to me to be a POV.

I think that when the crisis comes to an end then one can write a section about the episode and its consequences. However at this moment it seems unappropriate, specially considering that Brazilians tend to defend passionally their opinions (and a edit war would begin) to keep doing this in this article - a link to a specific article would fit better (if I'm not wrong there seems to be a specific article already. Rfredian

I agree totally. Sorry if I bothered. José San Martin 00:47, August 14, 2005 (UTC)

Democratic socialism

Quoting. The anon user, who changed Socialism -> Democratic socialism wrote it my Talk.

"Eu mudei no artigo do PT em inglês para "Democratic Socialism" com base no Estatuto do PT aprovado pelo Diretório Nacional em 31/03/2001(Disponível no site do PT) em seu Capítulo 1,Artigo 1,o qual diz que o objetivo do PT é construir o socialismo democrático,e como está na Wikipedia a ideologia oficial é "Democratic Socialism" não somente "Socialism"."

Or in English, "I made the changes in the english article on PT to "Democratic Socialism" based on the party statutes aproved by the National Directory in 31/03/2001 (avaible at the party's official site), in the first chapter, first article, that says that PT's objective is build the democratic socialism. And as it is written in the [Portuguese] Wikipedia, the official ideology is the Democratic Socialism, not just Socialism".

I have to agree with him and I suggest to keep his changes. José San Martin 18:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to include the official position. However, many "Tendências" are explicitly Trotskyist (even taking part in the Fourth International), Maoist, and some, on the other hand, are Social-Democratic. Many independent members of the party also subscribe to one of these fringe ideologies. Therefore, I have just added references to these different currents of thought, for a more complete description.

Fair use rationale for Image:Pt-logo.jpg

Image:Pt-logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image has been replaced with an image found on the commons. --(Ptah, the El Daoud 18:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

labour Party

The title of the article is wrong. The title should be read "Labour Party". "Workers party" gives the wrong impression that the party consists of working people.--Mhsb (talk) 06:25, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Center-left

I apologize if I don't know Brazilian politics enough, and I'm not some ignorant redneck, but how can a party that's Marxist be considered center-left? Although I am aware it's for Social Democracy, so maybe I'm wrong even though it has Marxist factions. J390 (talk) 04:05, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You question is interesting. There are, in fact, some remaining radical (left-wing) groups in the party. But according to some sources, the party itself has a moderate position (center-left) today:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/feb/04/brazil-presidential-campaign

http://www.correiobraziliense.com.br/app/noticia182/2010/01/01/politica,i=163856/RADICALISMO+ENGAVETADO.shtml (Portuguese)

(I'll put these references in the article)

And also, according to this interview (in Portuguese), Lula, the party's most prominent member, doesn't consider himself as a "leftist":

http://noticias.terra.com.br/eleicoes2006/interna/0,,OI1070437-EI6652,00.html

--Laciportbus (talk) 06:15, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've been thinking about it today...I must admit I'm not sure about it. It's not always easy to determine what's the actual political position of a party. I've heard that the Workers' Party is "left-wing"...but the two sources I've cited above are considered reliable and they say that the political position is "center-left". Anyway, any other suggestions and/or references regarding this are welcome. --Laciportbus (talk) 05:19, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse, but one thing is what politicians says and another is what they are. I live in Brazil and they look more left than center-left. And actually they are adopting some practices similar to Chaves' Venezuela. Nerun (talk) 19:04, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone, yes, I would say that PT is a left to far left party, the centre-left party is PDT, the Democratic Labour Party, PT is on the left of the later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptwsm17 (talk • contribs) 14:56, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As of 2020 PT is not regarded as "center left" by non-leftist political commentators in Brazil. Its alliance with the Communist Party of Brazil and with the hard-left PSOL for example point to the direction of hard-left. The fact that the party's main strategist, Jose Dirceu claims it is a socialist party. It used to advocate more moderate policies 15 years ago (although it was always allied with the Communist Party of Brazil), but right now, after the information regarding many political scandals involving attempts to control the legislative and judiciary powers through bribery schemes has been released, it sounds rather ludicrous to call it a "social-democratic" party.--RafaelG (talk) 18:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When I looked it up, it was easy for non-leftist media in numerous countries to find data describing PT as a center-left party. Political terms used in Brazil are often distorted. In particular, in Brazil, the term "liberal" does not refer to center-left politics like North America, nor does it refer to centrist politics in most regions, including Europe. Even the far-rights call themselves "liberal" is the reality of Brazilian politics. On the other hand, even moderate political forces that are classified as center-left social liberal by European standards do not describe themselves as "liberal". PT should be seen as a simple center-left party, not left-wing party. Historically, it is true that PT was a Marxist party, and it is true that Lula da Silva shows off his friendship with the far-left regime in Venezuela, but it is more of a nationalist sentiment than a lef-wing. The PT regime took a center-left line based on the market economy and never left-wing rule. It is also important what official ideology a particular party advocates, but it is also important what form of governance it actually exhibits.--Storm598 (talk) 07:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And foreign policy itself is not much related to political position. As of 2022, Taiwan's conservative right-wing based on Chinese nationalism is favorable to the Chinese Communist Party, while the progressive left-wing based on Taiwanese nationalism is hostile to the Chinese Communist Party. The former cannot be regarded as left-wing and the latter cannot be regarded as right-wing. Even if the PT regime was close to the Venezuela far-left regime, they accepted a lot of neoliberal factors in economic policy. PT is a center-left party, not a left-wing party.--Storm598 (talk) 07:55, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the insight, BTW, @Storm598! FelipeFritschF (talk) 22:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

edits regarding corruptuion

Note to editors 187.109.142.39, 187.109.140.51, and 187.66.84.254. Your assertions may well be true. However, the edits you make present controversial information. These must be sourced, or I (and other editors) will continue to revert. Find a newspaper or something that mentions this, and the information will stay in the article. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability. Thanks! 78.26 (talk) 14:20, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Workers' Party (Brazil). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Membership source

Can any of you get the membership source to work? It doesn't work for me. http://inter04.tse.jus.br/ords/dwtse/f?p=2001:104:::NO::: Mr G (talk) 23:41, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]