Jump to content

Talk:Word Up! (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Word Up! (funk song))

Move

[edit]

This page ought to be moved to Word Up! (Melanie B). There are other versions: Word Up! Word Up! (Korn)

Word Up! is about the Cameo album. This article should be expanded to include the Cameo version of the song, and the Korn version should be merged here. Articles about songs should be about all versions of the song, other versions should not be given their own articles. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gun version

[edit]

Shouldn't Gun's 1994 cover of this song be mentioned more prominently here? The single was a top 10 hit in the UK and a big hit in many other countries, and their version is probably better known than any other version bar Cameo's original. 217.155.20.163 01:40, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely pathetic that Gun's version isn't given more prominence. It was Top Ten in the UK in the 1990s, but it's only given ONE line! What's with Mel B's multiple mixes getting all the limelight? It only had a brief flirtation with the Top Twenty before dropping like a stone. There's even more about that than there is about Cameo's original version! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.49.141.100 (talk) 04:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Truck Commercial

[edit]

Who did the one used in the truck commercial? 76.126.29.36 (talk) 18:44, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KoRn

[edit]

The KoRn version sounds identical to the original. 169.233.59.119 (talk) 18:42, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Origins and meaning of the phrase "word up"

[edit]

Someone please add section about the origins and meaning of the phrase "word up". Karl gregory jones (talk) 01:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Precisely.
What does this weird expression mean? 99.247.1.157 (talk) 00:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Additional version

[edit]

A lesser-known version of the song can be found on Rich Hopkins & Friends' LP "Los Monstros del Tucson Rock" (San Jacinto Records, 2004), with Greg the homeless guy on bass & vocals. Bgungle (talk) 01:50, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Exclamation Point

[edit]

Actually, only the album is called "Word Up!" The song is just "Word Up", no exclamation point. Here's the single's label and here's the album's back cover. Accordingly, I am editing and moving this.—Chowbok ☠ 20:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the edit is incorrect: the single is calles "word up!" with an exclamation mark, see front and rear cover of the single. you have conveniently taken a dutch pressing and the back insert of the album cd release, while ignoring the original release.

front cover: [1] back cover: [2] - esse quam videri - to be rather than to seem (talk) 01:31, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's the label that determines the song title, not the sleeve. I didn't realize the image was of the Dutch label (and was the "conveniently" really necessary? Way to AGF), but here's the American: [3].—Chowbok ☠ 01:38, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
cheers. it's the cover that determines the song title, however -- i shall add further sources from printed media once i dig them out. - esse quam videri - to be rather than to seem (talk) 03:26, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Verse melody

[edit]

Consider the origins of the verse melody Double_Dutch_Bus

http://www.whosampled.com/Frankie-Smith/Double-Dutch-Bus/ Meloday starts at ~ 0:014 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.194.165.41 (talk) 15:07, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use of notable cover version single cover

[edit]

Since the images, File:GunWordUp.jpg, File:Wordupcover.jpg, and File:Word_Up!.jpg have been removed by one editor citing WP:NFCC and reverted by three other editors also citing WP:NFCC, I am starting a discussion here so that the images is not deleted simply for being orphaned.

The single covers for the Gun, Melanie B and Korn cover versions pass the points of WP:NFCC. WP:NFCC#3 is met because the single covers is used for identification its respective versions and Cameo single cover cannot convey equivalent significant information and/or identification of the cover versions. WP:NFCC#8 is met because the single covers are used for identification and the images increas readers' understanding and not having them would be detrimental to the understanding of the cover versions. The single covers passes the first example of acceptable use of fair images at WP:NFCI: "Cover art: Cover art from various items, for visual identification only in the context of critical commentary of that item (not for identification without critical commentary)."

The current consensus for single covers in section infoboxes to represent notable cover versions are that they pass WP:NFCC and WP:NFCI. Since WP:SONGCOVER says notable cover versions should be covered in the article about the song and not have its own article, but if they had their own articles, the images would be acceptable there, so they are acceptable in the sections of the song article. The single covers are not alternate covers for Cameo cover, it is the primary cover for the cover versions and should be treated as such. If it is felt that the images should still be removed than the images should be taken to Wikipedia:Files for deletion instead of simply removed from the article. Aspects (talk) 18:36, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP: They are single art covers for notable cover versions.--SuperHotWiki (talk) 00:36, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Word Up! → Word Up! (album) and recreate Word Up! as a redirect to the disambiguation page at Word Up. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:30, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

– Like ...Baby One More Time, Blurred Lines and Oops!... I Did It Again, this is one of those cases where the song's more notable than the album. Unreal7 (talk) 16:37, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support Alternate proposal = Word Up! should redirect to the disambiguation page Word Up listing Word Up! (album) Word Up! (song). In ictu oculi (talk) 04:50, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move section to a new page

[edit]

I don't know if it would be a good idea, but I thought about moving the section of the Little Mix version into a new article. I don't know how it would be named maybe just "Word Up! (Little Mix song)" but since it's not their song I'm not sure about it. I have moved the section to my sandbox to preview it and it looks pretty good. Here is the preview.

Dimitris  talk 21:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why would the cover version get it own article?--SuperHotWiki (talk) 07:57, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think it can be expanded enough to have its own article. But if not, they it's okay. It's just a suggestion Dimitris  talk 13:00, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind, forget it. It was not a good idea at all. Dimitris  talk 13:58, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Similarity to Single Life

[edit]

As pointed out, both songs have the beginning notes from The Good, the Bad and the Ugly in their opening, but that's not all. Many phrases from the rhythm of Single Life can be found in Word Up. Basically the latter can be considered a remix of the first. 78.96.82.137 (talk) 19:24, 18 November 2016 (UTC) Mike GH[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Word Up! (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:00, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Using archiveurl causes the link not to work, so I have removed it from the article. Richard3120 (talk) 21:52, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Word Up! (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Word Up! (song)

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Word Up! (song)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "GER":

  • From Greatest Hits, Vol. 1 (Korn album): Peak chart positions for Korn in Germany:
    • "Chartverfolgung / Korn / Longplay" (in German). PhonoNet.
    • "Chartverfolgung / Korn / Single" (in German). PhonoNet.
  • From Follow the Leader (Korn album): Peak chart positions for Korn in Germany:
  • From The Path of Totality: "Chartverfolgung / Korn / Longplay" (in German). PhonoNet. Retrieved 2011-12-16.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possible hack on Gun chart history?

[edit]

The German charts part is red and in caps and makes no sense so needs updating. Alanjbint (talk) 07:55, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a hack, it's simply because the way Offizielle Deutsche Charts has reconfigured its website, a songid parameter is now necessary, and this is what the template can't locate and says is missing. We're trying to fix the 2000+ songs that this affects as soon as we can. Richard3120 (talk) 13:12, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Word_Up!_(song)&oldid=1208387884"