Talk:Women in the war in Donbas

Ukraine Low‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Military history: Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

On 23 September 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Women in the war in Donbas to Women in the war in Donbas (2014–2022). The result of the discussion was moved.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Combatants of the war in Donbas which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Female servicemen"

Although this is true, it appears only on one single page of the White Book 2019-2020 (p. 97). The whole document uses the terms

"servicemen" 118 times, including that 1 time "female servicemen" (p. 97)
"service personnel" (or "service-personnel") 60 times, including
- in the chapter 6 title Humanitarian Policy and Social Guarantees for Service Personnel in the Armed Forces),
- "female service-personnel" 6 times (all on p. 95),
- "women service-personnel" 2 times (both on p. 97, the same page as that 1 time "female servicemen")
"servicewomen" 0 times

Do we really need to focus on that 1 translation error in our main body text? In all other occassions it's perfectly fine, and we see that they adopt gender-neutral language in many places where it is clear that it is about women, or can include women. I'm removing this, and making this a proper reference. NLeeuw (talk) 10:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]