Talk:Women's fiction
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
[edit]The term "women writers" redirects to "women's fiction". This is wrong. "Women's fiction" is a term that supposes the audience, not the creator. --lquilter 13:24, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Sub genres
[edit]Could anyone expand on "other sub genres"? Robina Fox (talk) 20:27, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Women's fiction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130125020900/http://www.rwa-wf.com/about/ to http://www.rwa-wf.com/about/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Women's Fiction Writers' Association
[edit]I don't know if this deserves a page, but since Romance Writers of America has one, it probably does. I haven't the expertise to write more than the barest stub, so who'll take up the challenge? Chrismorey (talk) 05:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Validity of the Term
[edit]I've heard (but can't provide a referenced source for) criticism that 'Women's Fiction' is an inappropriate name for a genre which is (a) not exclusively read by women - though they may be the main audience, as is true of much modern fiction (b) has demeaning overtones, like 'chick-flick'. In kicking this around with other writers, we considered that more accurate terms would include bildungsroman or coming-of-age, though neither is perfect.
Is this therefore really a high-importance entry that requires amplification? Chrismorey (talk) 11:47, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- Start-Class Literature articles
- Low-importance Literature articles
- Start-Class Gender studies articles
- High-importance Gender studies articles
- WikiProject Gender studies articles
- Start-Class Women's History articles
- High-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- Start-Class Women writers articles
- High-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles