The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
@Amanda A. Brant: I checked the wording of the section before I reverted to the previous ‘conservative’ heading. There is nothing in the section wording which supports referring to the organisations mentioned as ‘far right’. The word ‘conservative’ is used to refer to various organisations. Your edit summary says: ADF, The Heritage Foundation, WDI, Family Research Council (an extremist anti-LGBT group designated as a hate group by SPLC) have all been linked to the far right…..
So, according to your edit summary, the organisations themselves are not far right – they have just been linked to the far right. And you are saying that WoLF is linked to organisations which themselves have been linked to the far right. There is no way that these tenuous alleged ‘links’ justify a heading implying that WoLF has links to the far right. You have provided no sources for links to the far-right. And you should have started a discussion on the Talk page, rather than reverting me.
There is a general problem about describing political organisations and positions as right, left, conservative, radical – these categories are not clear, particularly nowadays, when right-wing parties may be radical, and left-wing parties, opposing, may be described as ‘conservative with a small “c” ‘. But calling a party ‘far right’ may be considered defamatory, [1] and should only be used where there is very good sourcing for the term. Sweet6970 (talk) 15:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They have been described as far-right by reliable sources and reputable organizations.
Family Research Council: [2][3][4][5][6][7] Heck, even Catholic media call them far-right[8]. They are designated as a hate group by SPLC.
And so it goes on and on. So yes, they are all far-right, multiple of them are SPLC-designated hate groups. Describing them as "conservative" is like describing the Ku Klux Klan – or any other SPLC-designated hate group – as "conservative". "Linked to" is a bit ambiguous, and can mean that they are far-right or in proximity to the far right; the former was meant here. --Amanda A. Brant (talk) 17:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I see from your post that some reliable sources have referred to these organisations as ‘far-right’. However, our articles on them call them ‘conservative’. In these circumstances, I will accept the amendment to ‘right-wing’. Sweet6970 (talk) 14:31, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
