Talk:Woman to Woman (campaign)

A fact from Woman to Woman (campaign) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 March 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the 2015 campaign Woman to Woman included a "Pink Bus" that was mocked by critics as sexist and patronising?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Woman to Woman (campaign).

Wikipedia

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Feminism

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 15:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Harriet Harman's Pink Bus was originally said to have been magenta or fuchsia? Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/election-2015-32498961
- ALT1: ... that there was some debate whether or not Harriet Harman's campaign bus was pink, magenta or fuchsia? Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/election-2015-32498961
- Reviewed:
- Comment: This is my first ever nomination. I thought I should try it out.

Created by Moondragon21 (talk). Self-nominated at 11:44, 18 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article covers all the necessary criteria for DYK. Confirmed QPQ not required (user has 4 previous credits but first time nominating themselves). Happy to pass this one. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 19:30, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Moondragon21 and Sims2aholic8: the article doesn't really make it clear what the debate actually is, or who said it to be magenta or fuchsia. Could more context be added? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 10:18, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
theleekycauldron ALT2 ... that Harriet Harman's Pink Bus was mocked by critics for resembling a Barbie bus, which was thought to be sexist and patronizing? SL93 (talk) 08:34, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@SL93: hmmm... possibly a gen4a violation against Harman? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 02:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
theleekycauldron Possibly, but that is the context. There seems to be nothing much to work with beyond the controversy so I suggest closing the nomination if nothing else can be found soon. SL93 (talk) 02:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I guess we could just leave out her name... theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 02:23, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ALT3 ... that the 2015 "Woman to Woman" campaign included a "Pink Bus" that was mocked by critics as sexist and patronizing?
SL93, theleekycauldron, I was surprised how little there was to the article beyond the critics; not even an examination of whether it was effective in the constituencies that the bus visited. (Is there a reason that ALT3 has "Pink Bus" in quotes, rather than just a regular lowercase pink bus? (Harmon acknowledged that it was pink, according to the article.) If you think that any of the hooks can fly, then a reviewer should be requested. If not, then this should probably be closed; the original nominator has not posted here in a month and a half. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hook issues remain, and the nominator has not responded to concerns raised despite pings and talk page messages as well as activity elsewhere. Marking for closure as abandoned. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:49, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@theleekycauldron (talk I like your hook Moondragon21 (talk) 16:21, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Theleekycauldron and BlueMoonset: Before this is closed, I would note that the nominator has made some attempt to address concerns above. [1]. starship .paint (exalt) 13:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ALT3 needs a review. The nominator has also added new sections since the first review. Flibirigit (talk) 02:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ALT3 - the3 best imo - & extra sections (a response to complaints above) are ok. GTG (hope it's ok to butt in). Johnbod (talk) 02:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]