Jump to content

Talk:Wolf Prize in Physics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wolf Prize in Physics

[edit]

2004 award that went to Higgs, Brout, and Englert is pretty tainted seeing that it did not include Guralnik, Hagen, and Kibble (GHK) in that award. That GHK team had the most complete solution and 1) showed how the gauge particle got mass, 2) predicted and commented on the existence of the "higgs" field and boson, and 3) showed how Goldstone's theorem is avoided, and 4) had no errors (when dealing with poles for example). The other two did not do all four. All three papers were recognized as milestone papers by PRL’s 50th anniversary celebration. [1] Additionally, each of the six physicists were awarded the 2010 J. J. Sakurai Prize for Theoretical Particle Physics for this work. [2] Guralnik just wrote a summary of this paper and the history of the discovery. It is a good read if you are interested in the history of the mass boson and the physics in the 1960's. (http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.3466). Nobel Prize will have to figure out how to award to all three groups and six individuals (which is permitted by the Nobel will) or wait (and wait). LHC Mary (talk) 01:25, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wolf Prize in Physics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:46, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]