Talk:Wlpan

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Wales High‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I feel quite strongly that "Wlpan" should not be merged with "Ulpan". Whilst the word derives from "Ulpan", Wlpan in this context has attained a meaning in its own right, with its associated links, etc. We could, however, have a link to "Ulpan", which I think would be appropriate. Hogyn Lleol 18:13, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In fact I've now made a Wiki link to "Ulpan". The more I think about it, I cannot see any good reason to merge, just because the words have a shared origin. Hogyn Lleol 18:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In Wales (and beyond) Wlpan is well-known in its own right for what it is. I agree with the comments above that a merger would be inappropriate. Pili-pala 13:45, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not answering, I am agree that it's a completely different thing. When I tagged the article with "merge", it was not clear from the text. --Yms 06:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]