Talk:Wisteria frutescens

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that a range map be included in this article to improve its quality.

United States Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested a map or maps to be included in this article to improve its quality. Once the map is uploaded, please remove the `\|needs-map=` parameter from this template.

Merged talk page

The old talk page from Wisteria microstachya (now a redirect) has been moved to Talk:Wisteria frutescens/macrostachya archive to preserve attribution. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:39, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested Move

A request was made to move this article to the scientific name. This request was not fulfilled due to a lack of discussion, and therefore a lack of consensus for it. Rob Church ^Talk 12:50, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

References

Added a reference page to cite article, University of Texas at Austin Native plant database. Not sure if layout is up to standards.Monik86 ^Talk01:30, 17 May 2012 (UTC))[reply]