Talk:Winning (film)

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move to Winning. Counting the nominator, the vote was three to one. Also, the disambiguation page at Win does not have any entries that contain the word "winning". -- Kjkolb 09:56, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Winning (film) → Winning … Rationale: Winning currently redirects to Win. I think that this film could take the primary link and if desired a disambiguation to Win could exist at the top. --Brian G 01:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Oppose. The title is not so uncommon.--Semioli 13:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I'm sorry, I'm confused by your posting. If the name of the film is not uncommon, then why shouldn't it take the primary link? Is there something else that is more common? --Brian G 14:51, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  No, but every time the name is common, the movie goes disambiguated.--Semioli 14:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. With a link at the top to the dab page, this should be fine. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 14:51, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per nom. Crumbsucker 00:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Luther never apologizes to Frank

Luther repeatedly tells Frank that the affair "was wrong" and then says that he's out of the picture now. Finally, Luther tells Frank that he's "won". It is at this point that Frank punches Luther. Since it could be argued that the entire title of the film is tied to this point, this really should be changed in the article.70.36.142.25 (talk) 18:12, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 December 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved — Amakuru (talk) 14:13, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Winning → Winning (film)
Winning (disambiguation) → Winning

– It is difficult to determine if people are coming from incoming links (as a Paul Newman film), the concept of victory, or because people do know about the film, but Winning (Russ Ballard song) is equally notable based on pageviews alone. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 22:54, 31 December 2019 (UTC) Pageviews[reply]

Support. This film clearly isn't winning when it comes to the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC criteria... hahaha... I'll see myself out... Nohomersryan (talk) 02:17, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- disambiguation is good. Dicklyon (talk) 05:42, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - its an everyday word, and so disambiguation should be at primary. -- Netoholic @ 11:33, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Material that was recently added to plot is a great deal of Fabulation

A great deal of the material added to the Plot Summary on December 7, 2023 by an IP user is not information that is apparent from viewing the film and is POV and probably copied from the Winning novel.

This edit needs to be revised so that only the "Plot" and information apparent from watching the film is presented. Osomite 🐻 (hablemos) 04:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]