Talk:Windmill Theatre

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Windmill Theatre article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Mid‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality: Sex work Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Nudity Low‑importance

	Nudity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nudity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of nudity and naturism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NudityWikipedia:WikiProject NudityTemplate:WikiProject Nuditynudity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of the theatre in its heyday be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in London may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Comment

I would enjoy seeing a less chatty, more detatched tone to this article. The film section reads like a series of movie reviews.

Agreed; the "Film depictions" section is the most egregious, but overall it needs cleanup and citations. 130.184.14.142 00:15, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with above.

Also: 'The second movie was Murder at the Windmill - a 1949 low-budget exploitation movie which was little more than an excuse to feature the Windmill boys and girls performing intercut with a very weak plot about the murder of a man in the front row.'

Is this really neutral?Dannpm 00:12, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seedy Soho

This passage in the article seems a bit odd:

London's Soho neighborhood had become a seedier place. The Soho neighborhood of the 1930s and 1940s was a respectable place filled with shops and family restaurants.

I'm thinking maybe it was the Windmill itself which attracted the seedier elements to the area. It was hardly providing family entertainment...Colin4C 09:17, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Postwar years

On 9 June 1974 the Windmill Cinema closed. The cinema's lease was bought in February 1974 by nightclub and erotica entrepreneur, Paul Raymond. Raymond made it a home for nude shows "à la Revuedeville but without the comic element". The first production at the now renamed Windmill Theatre was a play called Lets Get Laid which opened on 2 September 1974.

The dates don't seem sensible to me. Should the closing be June 1973 instead of 1974? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.123.109.130 (talk) 08:38, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Motto

Surely the motto was 'We Never Close', and when it did eventually close, they published a book about it, titled 'We Never Closed'. Valetude (talk) 19:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Windmill Theatre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090118191405/http://www.magforum.com/mens/mensmagazinesatoz10.htm to http://www.magforum.com/mens/mensmagazinesatoz10.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]