Talk:Willow Grove Park Mall/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 12:53, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The article is well written and maintains a good style throughout.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The article is well referenced, with plenty of citations.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   It covers the major aspects of the subject.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   The article maintains a neutral point of view.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Images are freely licenced and used well.

7. Overall: Good work. For future improvement, look to try and increase the size of the Economic impact section with more figures. Harrison49 (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

   Pass/Fail: