Jump to content

Talk:Willow Grove Park Mall

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWillow Grove Park Mall has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 24, 2011Good article nomineeListed
March 10, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Willow Grove Park Mall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 12:53, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The article is well written and maintains a good style throughout.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    The article is well referenced, with plenty of citations.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    It covers the major aspects of the subject.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    The article maintains a neutral point of view.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Images are freely licenced and used well.
  7. Overall: Good work. For future improvement, look to try and increase the size of the Economic impact section with more figures. Harrison49 (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Pass/Fail:

Mall sold - not!

[edit]

Apologies for the confusion in my edit which cited the Mall's having been sold once more. The subject of the article was a shopping center, not the mall. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:55, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]