Talk:Williamsburgh Savings Bank Building (175 Broadway)

Williamsburgh Savings Bank Building (175 Broadway) has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 14, 2022. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Williamsburgh Savings Bank Building (175 Broadway) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 April 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that though one publication said in 2001 that going to the Williamsburgh Savings Bank Building was like "an act of religious devotion", it was poorly suited for modern uses?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Williamsburgh Savings Bank Building (175 Broadway).

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 23:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Williamsburgh Savings Bank Building at 175 Broadway

... that though one publication said in 2001 that going to the Williamsburgh Savings Bank Building was like "an act of religious devotion", it was poorly suited for modern uses? Source: Aber, Andrew; Baker, R C; Bardel, Lou; Bastidas, Grace (October 23, 2001). "Best of NYC: Culture". The Village Voice. pp. 116–127; Traster, Tina (August 15, 2011). "Retailers, restaurants vault into old banks". Crain's New York Business. Vol. 27, no. 33. p. 13.
- ALT1: ... that after the Williamsburgh Savings Bank Building was restored, it hosted an awards ceremony in which the building itself received an award? Source: "Outstanding Brooklyn restoration projects honored at Landmarks Conservancy's Moses Awards". Brooklyn Eagle. May 6, 2014.
- ALT2: ... that the Williamsburgh Savings Bank Building has one of New York City's few remaining birdcage elevators? Source: McDonald, Martha (December 7, 2015). "David Scott Parker Architects: The 2015 Palladio Awards". Traditional Building.
- ALT8: ... that the dome of the Williamsburgh Savings Bank Building inspired that above the Williamsburgh Savings Bank Tower, despite objections from the tower's architects? Source: [1]. This numbering is correct because it's a double nom. See also Template:Did you know nominations/Williamsburgh Savings Bank Tower; if this hook is chosen, it has to be approved in both nominations.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Avril Coleridge-Taylor

Created by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 14:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Article was created 1 April. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. QPQ is done. Hooks are interesting and sourced. I like the primary hook. I think there may be a typo on ALT8. You meant to type the “dome above”? I’d personally like to see the two buildings have separate DYKs, but a combined may be interesting. I don’t think many people are aware of the connection between the two buildings. Looks ready to go. Congratulations on this excellent article! Thriley (talk) 21:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Thriley: Thanks for the review - I'm fine with either a separate hook or a combination hook. For ALT8, yes, that is what I meant, but both are technically grammatically correct; "that above" is short for "[the dome] above". Epicgenius (talk) 00:31, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ah.. I read it too quickly! Looks perfectly fine. Best, Thriley (talk) 06:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ALT0 to T:DYK/P1

Map

@Epicgenius: I tried to fix the map, but I did something wrong. I have to run to something so I can’t take the time to fix. Another superb article! Was always a favorite of mine. Thriley (talk) 15:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Thriley: Thanks! I really appreciate it. Somehow I copied the map and coords from another article directly and forgot to fix them here. I've adjusted it now. Thanks for the heads up. Epicgenius (talk) 16:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]