Talk:William Vitarelli
Appearance
William Vitarelli has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 20, 2016. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that William Vitarelli led community and educational projects in Micronesia after winning a US Supreme Court case about his alleged associations with the Communist Party USA? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:William Vitarelli/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 18:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR 18:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
Checking against the GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- No original research found.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
This article meets the criteria, so I'll pass it outright. It is well written and comprehensive for the subject, hence why I found no issues with it. JAGUAR 19:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class New York City articles
- Low-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles
- GA-Class New York (state) articles
- Low-importance New York (state) articles
- GA-Class Micronesia articles
- Mid-importance Micronesia articles
- GA-Class Palau articles
- Mid-importance Palau articles
- Palau work group articles
- WikiProject Micronesia articles