Jump to content

Talk:William Vitarelli

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWilliam Vitarelli has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 4, 2016Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 20, 2016.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that William Vitarelli led community and educational projects in Micronesia after winning a US Supreme Court case about his alleged associations with the Communist Party USA?

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:William Vitarelli/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 18:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  18:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The lead will benefit from a small expansion in order to summarise the article
    " While on Saipan" - don't you mean 'in'? Just figured it's an island
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

This article meets the criteria, so I'll pass it outright. It is well written and comprehensive for the subject, hence why I found no issues with it. JAGUAR  19:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]