Jump to content

Talk:William Sidney, 1st Viscount De L'Isle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

VC

[edit]

The second para while perfetly ok seems oddly placed and slightly confusing appearing as it does straight after the opening statement. Perhaps it would be better placed after the section on his wartime service under a sub section victoria cross.Alci12 12:48, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.

For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter, here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you. --Whpq (talk) 21:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies/slim majority

[edit]

There were no political or constitutional controversies during his term, even though the Menzies Liberal government until November 1963 enjoyed a majority in the House of Representatives of just 2 seats.

Not sure what this is saying. A majority is a majority, and as long as everyone turns up for the vote, the government is in control. On the other hand, there are always political controversies - but not necessarily ones that would be remembered and written about for generations. Can anyone elucidate this sentence? -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 03:03, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving House of Commons

[edit]

He is stated to have succeeded to his father's peerage in June 1945, requiring translation to the House of Lords and then that he retired at the July 1945 General Election (held later than June and before September 1945). Surely his father's succession would have taken the decision not to contest the election out of his hands, unless he had announced his decision before his father's death. This needs clarifying.Cloptonson (talk) 13:12, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Post-nominal letters

[edit]

@Abraham, B.S.: Do you have a source for what you were saying about the practices regarding the post-nominal letters for the Order of St John being different during Viscount De L'Isle's lifetime? And I'm still unclear as to the rationale for the deviation from the standard post-nominal letter formatting. 142.160.131.202 (talk) 04:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've wondered about this too. Our article Order of Saint John (chartered 1888) states "post-nominal letters of the order are not generally used outside the organisation itself, except in biographical entries, and a Knight and Dame may not use the prefix Sir or Dame". Ivar the Boneful (talk) 06:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ivar the Boneful, you seem to have answered this query with your own quote, viz: "post-nominal letters of the order are not generally used ... except in biographical entries". Further, per [1] Australia, for instance, followed the British precedent of using postnominals within the Order of St John until Australia federally ceased to use them in 1982 (though Britain continued to do so). However, and regardless of whether 'KStJ' is included or not, there is no reason to alter the sizing of the postnominals within this article. 85% sizing is hardly the standard – full size is the most consistently used in articles on British (and Australian) military figures. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 05:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on William Sidney, 1st Viscount De L'Isle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on William Sidney, 1st Viscount De L'Isle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:William_Sidney,_1st_Viscount_De_L%27Isle&oldid=1253314879"