Talk:William Paynel/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Serial Number 54129 (talk · contribs) 15:09, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
"I've been waiting for you, Billy Ray" :) great-granddaddy, etc., of one of these scroats I believe... SN54129 15:09, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- The authors are mostly modern, well known in the scholarship and writing for respectable publishers.
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- Earwig brings up noth9ng, neither does Google more generally.
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- ✓ Pass
- Pass or Fail:
Usual suggestions. Ready to promote anyway.
- Might be worth linking Anglo-Norman.
- Also Yorkshire, Lincolnshire, and Normandy.
- "when it was seized by" -- suggest "captured", avoid repeating "seized".
- "of Stephen's reign from 1135 to 1154" -- I think you could lose the "from *1135" as it's implicit on Stephen's claiming the throne...up to you though.
- You link Drax, but Drax Priory has an article too, if you want it. SN54129 15:47, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- I think I got all these. I have realized I need to make charts to figure out who in all these noble families I've done and who still needs doing... Ealdgyth (talk) 19:13, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Good work! Passing. SN54129 19:55, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- I think I got all these. I have realized I need to make charts to figure out who in all these noble families I've done and who still needs doing... Ealdgyth (talk) 19:13, 9 March 2022 (UTC)