Talk:William Paynel

William Paynel has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 9, 2022. (Reviewed version).

A fact from William Paynel appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 January 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that William Paynel supported Matilda's claim to the English throne, despite her husband Geoffrey of Anjou having previously attacked William's castle?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Paynel.

Wikipedia

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

DYK nom..

SOurces...

~~here~~ and ~~here~~ and ~~here~~ and ~~here (PhD thesis)~~ and ~~here~~ -- Ealdgyth (talk) 23:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:William Paynel/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Serial Number 54129 (talk · contribs) 15:09, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"I've been waiting for you, Billy Ray" :) great-granddaddy, etc., of one of these scroats I believe... SN54129 15:09, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
The authors are mostly modern, well known in the scholarship and writing for respectable publishers.

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Earwig brings up noth9ng, neither does Google more generally.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
✓ Pass

Usual suggestions. Ready to promote anyway.

Might be worth linking Anglo-Norman.
Also Yorkshire, Lincolnshire, and Normandy.
"when it was seized by" -- suggest "captured", avoid repeating "seized".
"of Stephen's reign from 1135 to 1154" -- I think you could lose the "from *1135" as it's implicit on Stephen's claiming the throne...up to you though.
You link Drax, but Drax Priory has an article too, if you want it.
SN54129 15:47, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I think I got all these. I have realized I need to make charts to figure out who in all these noble families I've done and who still needs doing... Ealdgyth (talk) 19:13, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - Good work! Passing. SN54129 19:55, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]