This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the William McDonough article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
A couple of years ago, I added a few small, cited criticisms of McDonough that were raised in the magazine Fast Company. McDonough PR employee (https://www.linkedin.com/pub/kira-gould/1/6bb/197) KiraGould removed them, as did user RRRFootprint. Having noticed this recently, I spent hours researching criticisms of McDonough, and provided some deeply researched balance to this article, citing Fast Company's detailed profile of McDonough and PBS' Frontline episode dedicated to the flaws in his work. (I also notified KiraGould that her edits were not appropriate under WP:COI.) User RRRFootprint reverted these changes, citing "not enough independent sources - minority views of a specific project." Given McDonough's history of modifying this entry to remove criticisms, and given the speciousness of his reversion claim, I think it's likely that RRRFootprint should also not be contributing to this entry, under WP:COI. I challenge RRRFootprint to demonstrate that he is not prohibited from contributing to this entry under WP:COI. Before further edits are made to add or remove criticisms, they should be addressed here. --WaldoJ (talk) 17:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Waldo – thanks for pointing this out and the time you took to research the information.
What I mean by lack of diverse citations and not enough independent sources, is that the information added was cited by the same source throughout. So here we have a lack of diversity and because it is the only source, there is a lack independent sources. WP:NRVE
Pertaining to the undue weight, this guy who’s worked on several projects throughout his career, it is not necessary to mention every project that he has been involved in. If we gave information on each project, then we’d run into the issue of what makes one project “encyclopedic” over the others? Also, the lack of independent sources depicts that this information is of a minority view (that there is not enough reliable sources providing the same information). So by giving a minority view as much details more widely held views, creates undue weight. More info: WP:UNDUE
Given the above mentioned, the lack of supporting citations and lack of significant attention from sources supporting the added information, makes the information problematic to verify as notable. --RRRFootprint — Preceding undated comment added 17:07, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
