Talk:Wilfred Bion

Biography: Military / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / British / European / World War I / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

Colorlessness

Article feels a little colorless, maybe something with faulty Wikipedia processes based on misrepresented policies. The concrete lack of the article is explanations on what Bion actually achieved (i.e. much/influential etc.), and the dry non-explanative colorless description on the superficial structure of his life. Said: Rursus ☻ 06:14, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bion's theory of mind

Sorry, this kind of jumps into the middle of the discussion, but i wanted to get something started that might invite others to help elaborate a rather complex theory of mental development, as nothing was actually said about what is so exciting about Bion as a theorist. Have at it! Majicshrink (talk) 21:03, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

portal

Shouldn't this be part of the psychology portal? Bion is a theorist within psychoanalytic discourse. If so, I have no idea how to make this happen, so I just say so here. Majicshrink (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bionic Iceberg

Hope to have moved the article on a tad, but still scratching the Bionic surface, I feel. C-constructs, -L, -H: these are just the bits that I know I don't know....Eventualism! Jacobisq (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bion, reality and truth

I note from my limited reading (this afternoon, briefly, three papers) on Bion's work and legacy, that he was considerably concerned with "a drive for truth" and "reality". Yet much of the present article seems merely to uncritically elaborate various of his theories, without any attempt to provide evidence for their truth or reality, or even for their significance to later psychology outside the rather limited "Tavistock tradition" of psychoanalysis.

I conclude that in its present form the article lacks our cherished Neutral Point of View (NPOV). Can anybody (better informed than I) redress this imbalance? yoyo (talk) 08:50, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Bizarre object → Wilfred Bion

The bizarre object article does not make sense. I am unable to examine the cited sources because I do not have easy access to them, but by their titles, they seem to not have "bizarre object" as their subject and instead generally present the work of psychologist Wilfred Bion.

The current title of that article, "bizarre object", is surprising because it is a strange name referring to a specific aspect of a psychology theory which does not have its own Wikipedia article. Ideally we could merge this content to an article on Bion's theory, like we have an article for Freud's psychoanalytic theories, but since that article does not exist, I think it is best to move all of this content to the biography of Bion. If anyone made a page for Bion's theories in the future then this content could go there. Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:27, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 09:23, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ambigous citation

In the Section on "Alpha elements, beta elements, and alpha function" a work is sourced as (1962), but two sources from 1962 exist, 1962a and 1962b 178.115.39.170 (talk) 20:21, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]