Talk:Wihtwara

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Isle of Wight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of the Isle of Wight in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Isle of WightWikipedia:WikiProject Isle of WightTemplate:WikiProject Isle of WightIsle of Wight-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stuf and Wihtgar

Although I find the similarity between Cerdic's "nephew" Wihtgar and the fortress Wihtwaraburg very striking I do not think we should disregard Wihtgar and call him fictional. I agree that "white spear" which is what Wihtgar mean, is an unusual name for a warrior and princeling of the Anglo-Saxons. However, Wihtwaraburg is an Anglo-Saxon name and someone had to have named it. Since we have no record recording the first Anglo-Saxons(probably the Jutes)in this island, why not call him Wihtgar, and his brother Stuf. Jross audrey (talk) 23:44, 25 March 2008

Whitwara and Raedwald

The name given to the "Men of Wight" was "wihtwara"- wara meaning men as in weregild, werewolf (who was one of Alfred the Great's scribes !)and "Cantwara"- men of Kent, Meonwara etc. Hence there is no need to posit a single eponymous founder. THe name Porstsmouth was also attributed to someone called "Port" even though the Romans called it Portus (meaning a port). We only have the passage from Bede to account for this period so you pays yer money and makes your choice whether you believe it or not. Between this date and the death of the last King Arwald in 686 there were seven kngs in Wessex and this is about average for the English Monarchy (long reigns tend to average out being followed by short) so there are a number of kings whose identity we will never know. I have found a reference to a King Redwald from a series of Churchills cigarette cards, but I cannot find any other reference, although one could include Wulfhere from 661 - Streona

A source for King Redwald can be found in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles for 617 "Redwald, King of the East-Angles" (Reverend J Ingram, pg32, The Saxon Chronicle AD1 to AD1154). As for Wulfhere, a king of the Mercian by that name was king during 661 (Ingram, pg 47), but there are others by that name. I don't think any of those where kings.76.251.243.242 (talk) 04:30, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Different King Redwald who is also said to be the king buried at Sutton Hoo. The familiarity of the name may have appealed to the instigators of the cigarette card myth. Wulfhere conquered the Island but left shortly after to go back to Mercia. Streona (talk) 16:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

This is taken from St Bede and Eddius Stephanus. I do not think there are any other primrary references available. Possibly Aldhelm butI don't think he mentions the Isle of Wight specifically.--Streona (talk) 12:04, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article is severely biased and needs a rework

As stated, this video goes into detail about badly this article is written, how it doesn't use sources, makes stuff up, and is clearly written by someone with a biased view of Wihtwara and its role as a haven for Anglo-Saxon paganism and gender equality. I believe these things should be addressed because as it stands this article does not live up to Wikipedia's standards in the slightest. ICommandeth (talk) 05:17, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's been on my list for a while now - I've made a start and I'm doing bits when I can although I am not the best person for the later Middle Ages section (though it seems like at that stage it's blending into just the history of the island more widely). Ingwina (talk) 12:24, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance of "Later Middle Ages" section

I am unsure of the relevance of the "Later Middle Ages" section. It seems to blend more into general history of the island rather than the specific Early Medieval people group. I wonder if it should be taken out and what folk think about this? This is key to defining the scope of the page. Ingwina (talk) 09:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]