Talk:Whren v. United States

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Shhalpe.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did Whren open up an (unintended) outcome of an increase in racial profiling?

Seems that the knock-on effects of the Whren decision and the specific allowance in US law of pretextual stops is back in the news and discussions in scholarly circles. N2e (talk) 19:51, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a few I found 20 years after the Whren decision was handed down:

Whren and Racial Profiling, June 2016.
Race, Trust and Police Legitimacy, 2013. (seems to have other pages related to the same topic linked there; e.g., http://www.nij.gov/topics/law-enforcement/legitimacy/Pages/traffic-stops.aspx
Stopped 52 Times by Police: Was It Racial Profiling?, July 2016.