Talk:Whittington Tump
Appearance
Whittington Tump has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 4, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Whittington Tump appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 January 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Whittington Tump/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 11:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Comments
- Where is the alt name of "Crookbarrow Hill" mentioned/referenced in the main body?
- Mentioned and reffed - Dumelow (talk) 05:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Feel free to link Worcestershire, I imagine a high portion of our readers have no idea.
- Linked and added England also
- Could you be a touch more specific in the lead to those of who do know where Worcs is, whereabouts in Worcs?
- went with "central Worcestershire" - Dumelow (talk) 05:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- "clayey" might be worth linking, this is such an awful word, and it may confuse.
- Linked to clay. Flashbacks to an engineering geology course ("grey sandy well-graded sub-rounded gravel with silt" etc.) - Dumelow (talk) 06:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Should The Red Book of Worcester be in italics and indeed linked if notable?
- Indeed yes. Italicised and linked, another to add to the list of articles to create! - Dumelow (talk) 06:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- "The tump, recognisable" is there a dicdef/link/footnote for "tump"? It's certainly a word I'm unaware of.
- There is a basic definition at Wiktionary but I think the opening paragraph at list of tumps (to which [[tump) redirects) is better (though unreferenced), linked - Dumelow (talk) 06:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- "as a land mark" one word or two?
- Went with landmark as or article is at that name - Dumelow (talk) 06:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- "pre-historic"/ prehistoric.
- Went with prehistoric as our article is at that name - Dumelow (talk) 06:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- "passed in Middlesex" link.
- Linked - Dumelow (talk) 06:07, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
That's all I have on a first read. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 20:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review The Rambling Man, I think I've addressed your poitns above - Dumelow (talk) 06:07, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- History good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class fortifications articles
- Fortifications task force articles
- GA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class Roman and Byzantine military history articles
- Roman and Byzantine military history task force articles
- GA-Class England-related articles
- Low-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- GA-Class Worcestershire articles
- Low-importance Worcestershire articles
- WikiProject Worcestershire articles