Talk:Whittington Castle

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Whittington Castle article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Fortifications / Technology / British / European / Medieval / Early Modern C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shropshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shropshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Shropshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShropshireWikipedia:WikiProject ShropshireTemplate:WikiProject ShropshireShropshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Expansion

When I came to this article, I found that it be be based on some highly derivative sources. Reliance on some of these have produced severely inaccuracies, which I have removed, relying on Brown, King and Remfry, of which I am one of the authors. This was based on thorough research in published and unpublished original sources. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the wonderful corrections and additions, and also the informative message above. As the original author, I really appreciate the help... I did, indeed, rely on "highly derivative sources". -- Rmrfstar (talk) 21:05, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You had put a lot together from websites, some of which were unfortunately not wholly accurate and no longer exist. Most of what I put in summarises the findings in our article. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:31, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, it is much better now. -- Rmrfstar (talk) 00:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Status

I have altered recent edits (which cited no sources):

I have removed the reference to Ellesmere only because I have not seen the source. I note that there is a similar statememt on that page, but it also lacks a citation. I have left the reference to Overton, though that is not supported by the reference now cited.
I was not happy about the reference to Maelor, because this is a Welsh name and particularly to the description as a [[cantref], whereas the evidence points to this being part of of Domesday Book England. If there is evidence of Whittington (and Oswestry) ever being part of Maelor, it should be cited, but I do not believe there is any.
In this area, Offa's Dyke seems to represent the boundary of England in the time of William I, as it probably had since the time of Offa of Mercia. It is thus wrong to use words such as "reverted".
The issue is complicated by those who have sought to build history from 17th century Welsh genealogies, which anachonisticly appear to show that the area was Welsh, when it almost certainly was not. I investigated this issue as part of the research for Brown, King, and Remfrey (of which I am a co-author) and was unable to trace the claims about Tudor Trevor further back than genealogies recorded by Lewis Dwmm. This appears to be a late medieval invention, with little or no historical basis. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:32, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]