White Horse (Taylor Swift song) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
As I pointed out in the GAR, Karlie Justus has journalistic experience (and she's not alone; the staff also includes writers from PopMatters and Country Weekly magazine). Despite calling itself a blog, The 9513 seems more like CMT or The Boot in structure. The 9513 also has "a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy". In the GA review for Darius Rucker, another editor raised the same question about its reliability, but after I pointed out that the site has professional writers behind it (including former PopMatters and Country Weekly staff), he considered it acceptable. Clay Walker and Reba McEntire both passed GA with citations from The 9513. So there is a precedent that The 9513 is an acceptable citation. (Also, I find it funny that you take issue with The 9513 but not Country Universe, which seems more bloglike to me.) Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention)18:47, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ipodnano has not given any proof as to the site's lack of reliability, so I have put the 9513 citation back in. Please don't remove it again without first discussing it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention)18:15, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh gosh, I'm so sorry for removing it. I hadn't read this yet. Anyways, it's a blog and per Wikipedia:SPS, it should be avoided. "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications. Take care when using such sources: if the information in question is really worth reporting, someone else will probably have done so." And it isn't even needed the same view about maturity is stated by the Billboard review, which is what the last quoted sentence refers to. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message04:03, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
